Shares of
Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd, earlier known as SKS Microfinance Ltd, on
Friday closed at 909.20—inching closer to the price at which retail investors
had bought its shares in an initial public offering (IPO) six years ago. The
1,654 crore SKS IPO in July 2010, the first by any microfinance company in
India and second in the world, was subscribed 13.7 times. The shares were sold
at 985 in the IPO, but retail investors were given a discount of 50. It was
listed on 16 August 2010 and soon rose to 1,490. That was before a crisis
hit the microfinance industry following the promulgation of a state law in
Andhra Pradesh. The law prompted large-scale defaults by borrowers and drying
up of bank funds to the microfinance sector, and the SKS stock soon plunged to
54.5 as investors rushed to sell.
The company posted a
net profit of 235.91 crore in the June quarter, an almost four-fold increase
from 61.16 crore a year ago on higher total income and a 96.85 crore tax write-back,
beating analysts’ estimates. The gross non-performing assets (NPAs) for the
quarter were 0.1% and, after setting aside money for bad loans, the net NPAs
were 0.03%. Its loan portfolio rose 76% to 8,463 crore from 4,797 crore in the
year-ago period.
Another listed
microfinance company which is on its way to become a small finance bank,
Ujjivan Financial Services Ltd’s stock rose to 540.85 on Friday before closing
at 511.40. In May, Ujjivan’s 887 crore IPO was subscribed 41 times. In less
than three months since its listing, the stock price has more than doubled. On
Friday, Ujjivan announced a 71.37 crore net profit for the June quarter, more
than double the profit it had reported in June 2015. Its loan book jumped 66%
in the past one year to 5,850 crore. Its gross NPAs in June were 0.18% and net
NPAs, 0.04%.
The third listed
microfinance entity, Equitas Holdings Ltd, closed at 196.35 on Friday, losing
around 2.5%, but it’s still trading at around 80% higher than its IPO price of
110. Its 2,163 crore IPO in the first week of April was subscribed 17 times.
Its June-quarter net profit rose 60%.
Clearly, there is a
re-rating of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs); investors are pulling out
of banks and putting their money in NBFCs as they are growing faster than banks
and their quality of assets is far better. The price-to-book ratio of Bharat
Financial— which we get by dividing the current price of the stock by the book
value per share—is probably the highest among all NBFCs barring mortgage lender
Gruh Finance Ltd. Bharat Financial’s one-year forward price-to-book ratio is
around 5.5, far higher than the best-performing private banks on the stock
market like HDFC Bank Ltd and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd (both around 3.75),
IndusInd Bank Ltd (3.5) and Yes Bank Ltd (close to 3). Among public sector
banks, only State Bank of India’s one-year forward price-to-book value is
higher than 1. Many of them are trading at half of their book value.
This is because
most public sector banks have bloated bad loans and very few of them are
actually growing the loan books. A handful of them announced their June-quarter
earnings and they indicate that there is no respite from adding to the pile of
bad loans and shrinking balance sheets.
The banks are not
lending for fear of accumulating more bad loans and the NBFCs are taking
advantage of that. What we are witnessing in the Indian financial sector now is
quite unique. The Reserve Bank of India seems to be pushing for a bank-led
financial system, but the business of lending is increasingly becoming sector
agnostic because of the emergence of new channels such as mobile and Internet.
The banking
regulator has given conditional licences to eight microfinance institutions to
set up small finance banks; it also wants some of the larger NBFCs to become
wholesale banks. However, for an NBFC, particularly a microfinance entity, the
incentives to become a bank is far less today than in the past. They don’t need
to entirely depend on banks for resources anymore; the Micro Units Development
and Refinance Agency Bank as well as the National Bank for Agriculture and
Rural Development are giving them funds. Besides, they can also collect
deposits from the borrowers and cater to their need for savings by being a
business correspondent of banks. Finally, new channels are being used to
disburse loans.
Indeed, they will
have to follow stricter norms for recognizing bad loans—from non-payment for
180 days to 90 days, on the line of banks—but this is not happening overnight.
Similarly, their capital requirement by the end of the current financial year
will not be as high as it was prescribed by an RBI panel in 2014. Finally, the
drop in the yield of 10-year government bond, currently trading at its lowest
since 2009, indicates that their cost of borrowing can only go down. No wonder
then that the NBFCs have aggressively been building their retail books and the
banks, though reluctant to lend to the borrowers directly, are happy to
increase their exposure to these companies.
The NBFCs have got
a fresh lease of life in the Indian financial system but does that explain the
investors’ bullishness on a few of them, particularly the two MFIs that will
become small finance banks? One thing is for sure that once they become banks,
they will not be able to sustain the pace of growth in their loan book as they
would need to focus on raising liabilities from the public in the form of
deposits and that won’t be a cakewalk. There is also no clarity on whether
Ujjivan and Equitas would need to tap the market again after three years of
starting the bank. Under the RBI norms, listing is mandatory for a bank within
three years. Both the entities have listed their holding companies. Of course,
the regulator can always relax the norms either by accepting the listing of a
holding company as a proxy for a bank or giving them more time for the bank
listing.
No comments:
Post a Comment