Showing posts with label Trade Finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trade Finance. Show all posts

Friday 11 March 2016

Crisil downgrades debt instruments of eight public sector banks

Rating agency also revises outlook of 5 other banks to ‘negative’ on loan quality concerns
Expecting the asset quality problems being faced by public sector banks to remain acute and continue through most of the next fiscal, Crisil on Thursday downgraded its ratings on the debt instruments of eight banks and revised its outlook on five other to ‘negative’ from ‘stable’.

The credit rating agency warned that the earnings profile of most PSBs has deteriorated with many expected to report a full-year net loss this fiscal. Further, many PSBs may report a loss even for the next fiscal.

The eight public sector banks (PSBs) whose debt instrument ratings have been downgraded are — Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Corporation Bank, Dena Bank, IDBI Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, Syndicate Bank, and UCO Bank.

The five PSBs whose outlook has been revised by Crisil to ‘negative’ are — Andhra Bank, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, Punjab National Bank, and Punjab & Sind Bank.

In the case of Syndicate Bank, its rating has also been placed on ‘rating watch with negative implications’.

Continued stress
Crisil said the continued asset quality problems will have its impact on PSBs’ profitability, and capitalisation can further dent the credit profiles over the medium term.

The agency estimated that significant stress in the corporate loan book of PSBs is expected to result in their weak assets ballooning to Rs. 7.1 lakh crore by March 31, 2017 (11.3 per cent of total loan book) from about Rs. 4 lakh crore as on March 31, 2015 (7.2 per cent of loan book).

Over the next few quarters, Crisil expects slippages to non-performing assets (NPAs) to remain high, driven by stretched cash flows of highly-leveraged corporates (mainly in vulnerable sectors, such as infrastructure, metals and real estate), continued proactive recognition of stressed assets by banks, and limited ability of banks in the current environment to recover from exposure to large corporates that have slipped into NPAs.

With the banking system having to migrate to the marginal cost of funds-based lending rate, or MCLR, regime from April 1, 2016, and the proportion of zero income-generating bad assets in the loan book of PSBs rising, net interest margin will come under fresh pressure in the near term.

“This, coupled with loan loss provisioning at a number of PSBs surpassing pre-provisioning profit due to increased slippages and rising inventory of ageing NPAs, could result in many PSBs reporting a loss even for the next fiscal,” said Crisil.

Sun Capital

Real estate regulator now a reality

The bill aims to empower home buyers and make developers accountable.
infrastucture-by-shah-junaid-(21)


The upper house of the parliament on Thursday passed the long-pending Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill 2015, paving the way for setting up of regulatory bodies to monitor projects and bring transparency and accountability in real estate transactions.

The bill aims to empower home buyers, make developers accountable toward their promises and put in place mechanism to check malpractices in the sector. The law is of immense value to home buyers who have long suffered with builders changing project plans without the consent of buyers or diverting funds from one project to another. 

 “This is a major reform that promises to bring in much-needed transparency and accountability to the rather opaque sector. It will create a much-needed consumer right protection umbrella for buyers of real estate, thereby increasing consumer confidence as well as creating lasting developer brands strong on quality and timely delivery of their projects,” said Anuj Puri, chairman and country head, JLL India.





The bill’s chief objective is to set up regulatory authority on the lines of other sectors like banking and telecom and also form appellate tribunals in states and union territories. The authority will appoint abjudicating officers to settle disputes, which will be taken up by the appellate tribunal. 
The regulator will work as a nodal agency and co-ordinate efforts regarding development of the sector with key stakeholder and the government.
Among other key features, all projects including commercial and residential starting from 500 square metres or eight apartments are to be registered with the regulator, against the earlier mandate of 1,000 square metres or 12 apartments. It will be applicable retrospectively across ongoing projects too. 
However, in a discussion on the bill in the parliament, Union Urban Development Minister Venkaiah Naidu said clarity is yet to emerge if the current framework will be applicable on ongoing projects as well. He also said state governments have the flexibility to lower the project size threshold for mandatory registration. 
All real estate agents who intend to sell plot, apartment or building also have to register with the regulator. with the regulator.

With a view to promote timely completion of projects, the bill makes it compulsory for developers to keep at least 70 per cent of customer advance, including land cost in a separate escrow account, to meet construction costs. This is up from the previous requirement of 50 per cent.  

The government has also brought in parity on interest payment in case of default. Now, builders will have to pay same interest as home buyers in case of default or delays—earlier home buyers were accountable for this. It has also increased the liability of builders from two years to five years in case of structural defects.  

In case of violation of orders of the appellate tribunal, builders will be charged with three years of imprisonment while agents and buyers will have to face one year of imprisonment or monetary penalty or both. It also advocates that disputes should be resolved within 60 days.

Impact
Anshuman Magazine, chairman and managing director, CBRE South Asia Pvt Ltd, said it will have a far reaching implication for the real estate and construction sector. “It will help regulate the sector and promote transparency. If implemented in the right spirit, it could facilitate greater volumes of domestic as well as overseas investment flows into the sector. Home buyer confidence in the property market is also likely to revive.” 

Experts believe that this will go a long way in reviving the confidence of home buyers. Sales in housing market has softened over the years as end users and investors have stayed away due to high prices and unchecked construction delays in the sector. This has taken the unsold stock to an alarming level with some cities sitting on a huge pile-up of inventory.
The bill aims to boost the confidence of home buyers with more transparency and accountability from the developers.

JC Sharma, vice chairman and managing director at Sobha Ltd, said this is a step in the right direction. But he added that the bill made no mention of time-bound approvals by various central, state and local agencies, which is critical to the sector’s growth.
It is expected that developers will also benefit once the law is implemented as they can access cheaper and wider source of financing. However, on the other side, it will also gradually weed out a lot of fly-by-night and non-serious players from the market. 



Tuesday 8 March 2016

Sebi may peg M&A ‘control’ cap at 25%

Regulator’s move is aimed at removing ambiguities that companies confront during takeovers

Mumbai: The market regulator is set to clarify what the term ‘control’ means in the context of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) by pegging the shareholding threshold of an acquirer at 25%, two persons familiar with the development said.
The move is aimed at removing ambiguities that companies currently confront during takeovers, one of the two persons said, requesting anonymity.
Currently, the definition of ‘control’ under the Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (SAST) Regulations, 2011—popularly known as the Takeover Code—doesn’t specify a threshold for shareholding.
“The numerical threshold for determining control is a globally accepted norm and should be the prescribed criteria along with the other factors which may signify control,” said Tejesh Chitlangi, a partner at law firm IC Legal.
The current takeover code states that an acquirer is in ‘control’ only if the board of the company that’s being acquired gives the former the right to appoint a majority of the directors, and have the final say on management and policy decisions.
The control of management or policy decisions is through shareholding or management rights or shareholders’ agreement or voting agreements.
“The Securities and Exchange Board of India board will clear a discussion paper on Saturday, which proposes to peg the numeric threshold of voting rights (shareholding) at 25% and giving protective rights to the acquirer,” said the second person, who also declined to be named.
A Sebi spokesperson did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment.
According to the discussion paper, there could be a framework for protective rights with an exhaustive list of rights that do not lead to acquisition of control.
These protective rights would be granted to the acquirer if they are cleared by 51% of the minority public shareholders.
“While it will be important to have a list which considers the commercial realities of merger and acquisition transactions, it may be a practically onerous task to have an exhaustive list that captures all the exempted protective rights and Sebi may need to grant an exemption on case-to-case basis,” the second person said.
According to Lalit Kumar, partner at J. Sagar Associates, there is currently no clarity on whether or not protective (veto) rights to investors will lead to control.
“This issue came up in the matter of Subhkam Ventures where Sebi held that protective rights lead to control. However, in appeal to the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), SAT held that protective rights only lead to negative control and not positive control,” Kumar said.
“The matter went in appeal to the Supreme Court, which did not pass any order on this issue but said that SAT’s order will not act as a precedent. Therefore, presently, there is no decided case on this issue although the general view is that protective rights do not lead to control,” he explained.
Kumar’s reference is to private equity investor Subhkam’s 17.9% stake in MSK Projects. In 2007, when it bought the stake, Subhkam sought and received several so-called negative rights (such as the power of veto on key decisions). In 2008, Sebi ruled that this constituted control. On appeal, SAT ruled in favour of Subhkam. Sebi appealed the case in the Supreme Court which dismissed the case. However, because it said SAT’s order would not be a precedent, private equity investors are still not sure as to whether negative rights such as the one Subhkam had constitute control (such rights are common in agreements between promoters and private equity firms).
Some in the legal fraternity say the definition of control cannot be set in stone.
“The question of control is a nuanced one primarily of fact and secondly of law… Anything set in stone on defining control would lead to false positives and negatives. Sebi should adopt a more nuanced approach and go by court rulings as precedents,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Law Advisors.
Sebi first started reviewing the definition of control in 2014. Finalizing a proposed framework took longer than expected, nearly 20 months, in wake of the number of suggestions.
Sebi decided to re-examine the definition of control following the 2013 acquisition of a 24% stake in Jet Airways (India) Ltd by Abu Dhabi-based Etihad Airways PJSC for Rs.2,058 crore.
In May 2014, Sebi ruled that the deal did not attract the provisions of the Takeover Code, as it found a lack of substantial controlling powers with Etihad after the transaction.

Saturday 5 March 2016

Banks now have room to raise funds via tier 2 bonds: RBI

With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) tweaking of banks’ core capital to include a part of real estate assets and foreign exchange, lenders will now have additional headroom to raise funds through tier 2 bonds, RBI deputy governor R Gandhi said on Thursday.

He told reporters on the sidelines of Gyan Sangam, a brainstorming session with financial sector players convened by the finance ministry, that Rs 25,000 crore of capital allocated for public sector banks in FY17 should be enough. “Banks can also go to the markets next year, so we believe it will be enough,” he said
On asset quality review, Gandhi said it is unlikely bad loans will spill over from FY16 to the next fiscal. “Spillover of bad loans unlikely in FY17 after the asset quality review,” he said. State-owned banks have been under severe stress arising out of delinquency in loans mostly belonging to infrastructure, power and steel sectors. As of September 2015, the stressed asset ratio — a combination of bad loans and recast assets — of public sector banks stood at 14.1%, versus 4.6% in private sector banks.
As per the RBI’s latest move, which is in sync with the Basel III capital norms, banks can account for 45% of their revalued real estate assets as tier 1 capital subject to riders.
The revised regulations on tier 1 capital include treating revaluation reserves, subject to conditions, as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital at a discount of 55%, instead of as tier 2 capital; treating foreign currency translation reserves, subject to conditions, as CET1 capital at a discount of 25%; and several directives on how to treat deferred tax assets vis-à-vis CET1 capital. These changes could improve the capital adequacy ratio of major PSBs by up to 100 basis points.
According to estimates, these relaxations, particularly that of treating revaluation reserves as CET1 capital, given the huge amounts of physical assets PSBs are sitting on, will free up capital upwards of Rs 30,000 crore-35,000 crore for them and upwards of Rs 5,000 crore for private sector banks.
Hinting that the RBI is looking at all such possible measures to augment the existing capital of banks, which would reduce the burden on them to raise fresh capital to a certain extent, governor Raghuram Rajan had hinted that the RBI is trying to identify non-recognisable capital, such as undervalued assets, already on bank balance sheets and could allow some of these to count as capital under Basel norms, provided a bank meets minimum common equity standards.

Friday 4 March 2016

10 Tips for the Successful Long-Term Investor

While it may be true that in the stock market there is no rule without an exception, there are some principles that are tough to dispute. Let's review 10 general principles to help investors get a better grasp of how to approach the market from a long-term view. Every point embodies some fundamental concept every investor should know.



1. Sell the Losers and Let the Winners Ride!

Time and time again, investors take profits by selling their appreciated investments, but they hold onto stocks that have declined in the hope of a rebound. If an investor doesn't know when it's time to let go of hopeless stocks, he or she can, in the worst-case scenario, see the stock sink to the point where it is almost worthless. Of course, the idea of holding onto high-quality investments while selling the poor ones is great in theory, but hard to put into practice. The following information might help:
  • Riding a Winner - Peter Lynch was famous for talking about "tenbaggers", or investments that increased tenfold in value. The theory is that much of his overall success was due to a small number of stocks in his portfolio that returned big. If you have a personal policy to sell after a stock has increased by a certain multiple - say three, for instance - you may never fully ride out a winner. No one in the history of investing with a "sell-after-I-have-tripled-my-money" mentality has ever had a tenbagger. Don't underestimate a stock that is performing well by sticking to some rigid personal rule - if you don't have a good understanding of the potential of your investments, your personal rules may end up being arbitrary and too limiting.

  • Selling a Loser - There is no guarantee that a stock will bounce back after a protracted decline. While it's important not to underestimate good stocks, it's equally important to be realistic about investments that are performing badly. Recognizing your losers is hard because it's also an acknowledgment of your mistake. But it's important to be honest when you realize that a stock is not performing as well as you expected it to. Don't be afraid to swallow your pride and move on before your losses become even greater.
In both cases, the point is to judge companies on their merits according to your research. In each situation, you still have to decide whether a price justifies future potential. Just remember not to let your fears limit your returns or inflate your losses.

2. Don't Chase a "Hot Tip."

Whether the tip comes from your brother, your cousin, your neighbor or even your broker, you shouldn't accept it as law. When you make an investment, it's important you know the reasons for doing so; do your own research and analysis of any company before you even consider investing your hard-earned money. Relying on a tidbit of information from someone else is not only an attempt at taking the easy way out, it's also a type of gambling. Sure, with some luck, tips sometimes pan out. But they will never make you an informed investor, which is what you need to be to be successful in the long run.

3. Don't Sweat the Small Stuff.
As a long-term investor, you shouldn't panic when your investments experience short-term movements. When tracking the activities of your investments, you should look at the big picture. Remember to be confident in the quality of your investments rather than nervous about the inevitable volatility of the short term. Also, don't overemphasize the few cents difference you might save from using a limit versus market order.
Granted, active traders will use these day-to-day and even minute-to-minute fluctuations as a way to make gains. But the gains of a long-term investor come from a completely different market movement - the one that occurs over many years - so keep your focus on developing your overall investment philosophy by educating yourself.

4. Don't Overemphasize the P/E Ratio.

Investors often place too much importance on the price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio). Because it is one key tool among many, using only this ratio to make buy or sell decisions is dangerous and ill-advised. The P/E ratio must be interpreted within a context, and it should be used in conjunction with other analytical processes. So, a low P/E ratio doesn't necessarily mean a security is undervalued, nor does a high P/E ratio necessarily mean a company is overvalued.


5. Resist the Lure of Penny Stocks.

A common misconception is that there is less to lose in buying a low-priced stock. But whether you buy a $5 stock that plunges to $0 or a $75 stock that does the same, either way you've lost 100% of your initial investment. A lousy $5 company has just as much downside risk as a lousy $75 company. In fact, a penny stock is probably riskier than a company with a higher share price, which would have more regulations placed on it.


6. Pick a Strategy and Stick With It.

Different people use different methods to pick stocks and fulfill investing goals. There are many ways to be successful and no one strategy is inherently better than any other. However, once you find your style, stick with it. An investor who flounders between different stock-picking strategies will probably experience the worst, rather than the best, of each. Constantly switching strategies effectively makes you a market timer, and this is definitely territory most investors should avoid. Take Warren Buffett's actions during the dotcom boom of the late '90s as an example. Buffett's value-oriented strategy had worked for him for decades, and - despite criticism from the media - it prevented him from getting sucked into tech startups that had no earnings and eventually crashed.


7. Focus on the Future.

The tough part about investing is that we are trying to make informed decisions based on things that have yet to happen. It's important to keep in mind that even though we use past data as an indication of things to come, it's what happens in the future that matters most.
A quote from Peter Lynch's book "One Up on Wall Street" (1990) about his experience with Subaru demonstrates this: "If I'd bothered to ask myself, 'How can this stock go any higher?' I would have never bought Subaru after it already went up twenty-fold. But I checked the fundamentals, realized that Subaru was still cheap, bought the stock, and made seven-fold after that." The point is to base a decision on future potential rather than on what has already happened in the past.

8. Adopt a Long-Term Perspective.

Large short-term profits can often entice those who are new to the market. But adopting a long-term horizon and dismissing the "get in, get out and make a killing" mentality is a must for any investor. This doesn't mean that it's impossible to make money by actively trading in the short term. But, as we already mentioned, investing and trading are very different ways of making gains from the market. Trading involves very different risks that buy-and-hold investors don't experience. As such, active trading requires certain specialized skills.

Neither investing style is necessarily better than the other - both have their pros and cons. But active trading can be wrong for someone without the appropriate time, financial resources, education and desire.


9. Be Open-Minded.

Many great companies are household names, but many good investments are not household names. Thousands of smaller companies have the potential to turn into the large blue chips of tomorrow. In fact, historically, small-caps have had greater returns than large-caps; over the decades from 1926-2001, small-cap stocks in the U.S. returned an average of 12.27% while the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) returned 10.53%.

This is not to suggest that you should devote your entire portfolio to small-cap stocks. Rather, understand that there are many great companies beyond those in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), and that by neglecting all these lesser-known companies, you could also be neglecting some of the biggest gains.

10. Be Concerned About Taxes, but Don't Worry.

Putting taxes above all else is a dangerous strategy, as it can often cause investors to make poor, misguided decisions. Yes, tax implications are important, but they are a secondary concern. The primary goals in investing are to grow and secure your money. You should always attempt to minimize the amount of tax you pay and maximize your after-tax return, but the situations are rare where you'll want to put tax considerations above all else when making an investment decision.


The Bottom Line

There are exceptions to every rule, but we hope that these solid tips for long-term investors and the common-sense principles we've discussed benefit you overall and provide some insight into how you should think about investing. If you are looking for more information about long term investing, Investopedia's Ask an Advisor tackles the topic by answering one of our user questions.

Sun Capital

Thursday 3 March 2016

Will a new credit rating system for infrastructure projects help?

CARE expects the proposed system could help under-development projects with a rating agency stepping in at the pre-bid level of infrastructure projects


Mumbai: Finance minister Arun Jaitley on Monday announced the formation of a new credit rating system for infrastructure projects in the country for better credit enhancement.
A new credit rating system for infrastructure projects will give “emphasis to various in-built credit enhancement structures… instead of relying upon a standard perception of risk which often result in mispriced loans,” the budget statement said.
The intent seems to be to help infrastructure projects access credit from multiple sources and at better rates. However, it is unclear how the new system would be different from the existing credit rating scale put in place by credit rating agencies. It is also unclear whether the proposed rating system would be for operational projects or under-development projects or both.
“I have not seen the details, but if I draw a comparison with the banking rating system, how will it be different? Has the existing banking rating system helped?” asked a former government official, who has been closely associated to road project financing, but did not want to be named.
There are no clear answers as of now.
D.R. Dogra, managing director and chief executive officer of Credit Analysis and Research Ltd (CARE), expects the proposed credit rating system could help under-development projects with a rating agency stepping in at the pre-bid level of infrastructure projects. “A rating agency can help identify issues which lead to a lower rating at the pre-bid stage, which can then be addressed before private bids are invited,” said Dogra, adding that he is not aware of the details of the proposed credit rating system as it has not been discussed with rating agencies yet.
Not all are of the same view though.
A top official from another rating agency points out the new announcement speaks about credit enhancement. “Credit enhancement measures are taken only once the infrastructure projects are operational. This is the point where a refinancing can happen and bank credit can be replaced with bonds. A better rating makes the bonds market accessible in a better way,” he said. He refused to be identified as the agency is not aware what the actual fine print of the credit rating system would be.
Infrastructure consultant Vinayak Chatterjee, chairman for Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd, is positive the new credit rating system would help the sector as the traditional rating methods do not fully take into account the risk in an infrastructure project which changes at different stages of the project life-cycle.
Even as the industry waits for details, a former rating agency official, who did not want to be named, said, “Need more clarity (on the details of the system), but mostly it would be inconsequential.”

GE to sell India financial services biz to Aion, former execs

The transaction represents about USD 400 million in ending net investment and includes businesses such as auto leasing, healthcare financing and corporate lending and leasing. 



General Electric Co said it would sell its India commercial lending and leasing businesses to a consortium of former GE Capital executives and Aion Capital Partners as it looks to trim itself and focus on its industrial businesses. 

The transaction represents about USD 400 million in ending net investment and includes businesses such as auto leasing, healthcare financing and corporate lending and leasing. Employees would also be transferred to the buyer, the company said. 

Aion has partnered with former GE Capital executives Pramod Bhasin and Anil Chawla for the acquisition. Bhasin was formerly the head of GE Capital in India and Asia. Chawla was the head of the commercial business operations of GE Capital India. 

Aion is a joint venture between ICICI Venture and Apollo Global Management.

Sun Capital Services

Wednesday 2 March 2016

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp to sell stake in Kotak Mahindra Bank

Sumitomo Mitsui is looking to sell almost half of its stake in Kotak Mahindra Bank for around $300 million
Shares of Kotak Mahindra Bank closed at Rs.630.25 on the BSE, up by 2.35%, while the benchmark Sensex closed at 23,002 points, down by 0.66%, on a day the stock markets witnessed volatile trading on account of the announcement of the union budget.

Mumbai: Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. is looking to sell almost half of its stake in private sector lender Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd, for around $300 million (approximately Rs.2,050 crore), according to two people aware of the development.
As of 31 December, Sumitomo held a 3.58% stake in the private-sector lender, data from stock exchanges show.
“The book has been launched and the sale is expected to close overnight,” said one of the two people mentioned above, requesting anonymity as he is not authorized to speak to the media.
Large domestic and foreign institutions have shown interest in buying the stake in block trade, he added.
Shares are being offered to buyers in a price range of Rs.611.34 to Rs.636.55 per share, according to Bloomberg. Citigroup Inc. is managing the share sale program, the report added. After the transaction, Sumitomo’s stake in the bank will fall to around 1.79%.
The Japanese bank firm had picked up a 4.5% stake in Kotak Mahindra Bank in 2010 through a preferential allotment for Rs.1,366 crore.
Shares of Kotak Mahindra Bank closed at Rs.630.25 on the BSE, up by 2.35%, while the benchmark Sensex closed at 23,002 points, down by 0.66%, on a day the stock markets witnessed volatile trading on account of the announcement of the Union budget.
Also, on Monday, California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest pension fund in the US, sold a stake worth around Rs.870 crore (approximately $127 million) in Axis Bank Ltd, according to data at stock exchanges.
Foreign institutional investor (FII) Genesis Indian Investment Co. Ltd bought the stake (around 0.94%) at a price of Rs.387.5 per share.
Last month Genesis bought a stake worth Rs.318 crore in Dabur India Ltd through an open market transaction, according to information on stock exchanges. The FII bought about 12.7 million shares, or a 0.72% stake, in Dabur.
In 2015, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, had assets under management of $298 billion, according to Preqin, a private equity database.
Shares of Axis Bank closed at Rs.375.25 on the BSE, down by 2.75%.

IDBI Bank unveils Rs 20,000-crore investment plan over three years

To raise Rs. 20,000-crore capital via equity route

MUMBAI: A day after Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said the government may consider bringing down its stake in state-run IDBI Bank to below 50 per cent, the lender today announced a "transformational" plan entailing an investment of about Rs 20,000 crore over a three-year period. 

The plan includes doubling the bank's business volumes and reducing gross NPA level below 3 per cent. 

"The plan rests on business growth and our approach will be to catch up with the industry. We will double our business from around Rs 5 lakh crore in FY16 to Rs 10 lakh crore in FY19, representing CAGR of over 20 per cent per annum," Managing Director and Chief Executive Kishor Kharat told reporters here. 

However, he was quick to add the "transformational plan" has nothing to do with the Government's move to reduce stake in the bank. 

"The plan has nothing to do with whether we remain a public sector or a private sector bank because it does not talk abut composition of ownership or holding. On a standalone basis we have made this plan for transforming the bank and therefore the thrust is more on business transformation." 

Kharat said bad loan will remain an issue for some more time but expressed confidence the bank will be entering the next fiscal with a lighter stress. "Our endeavour will be to bring down gross NPA to 3 per cent and net NPA to near 0 per cent." 

For the quarter ended December, the bank's gross NPAs jumped to 8.94 per cent from 5.94 per cent in the same period last year, while net NPA rose to 4.60 per cent. 

To meet the plan, the bank is looking at raising around Rs 19,000-20,000 crore over the next three years, he said. Besides, it will be raising Rs 4,000 crore from Tier I bonds and Rs 8,000-9,000 crore through Tier II bonds. 

The city-based lender has lined up around Rs 3,000 crore of assets for monetisation, of which it is expecting nearly Rs 1,200-1,500 crore to accrue this month. 

Kharat said he would like to list the bank's subsidiaries - IDBI Capital, IDBI AMC, IDBI Federal - but no final decision has been taken so far. "Right now, we will monetise to the extent of our need only." 

The bank has also put on hold its plan to raise Rs 3,771 crore through qualified institutional placement (QIP) route due to volatile market conditions. 

"We have put the QIP plans on hold for now because the price is not right at this point in time. The investor interest during our roadshow was very good but they wanted more clarity around the impact of AQR (asset quality review). Now that things are clearer, we will wait for the price to come back up," Kharat said.

JP-UltraTech Cement deal: Stressed lenders to receive about Rs 4,000 crore

MUMBAI: In what could be the biggest recovery of loans from a struggling company, Indian banks will receive about Rs 4,000 crore from the sale of Jaiprakash Associates' cement units to UltraTech Cement, said three people familiar with details of the deal. 

Lenders such as State Bank of India, IDBI Bank and ICICI Bank played an active role in the sale of the cement plants at an enterprise value of Rs 16,500 crore, said the people cited above. 

Banks have agreed to transfer about Rs 12,000 crore of Jaiprakash Associates' loans to the Kumar Mangalam Birla-owned unit, they said. Indian lenders are tightening the screws on promoters who are behind schedule in loan repayments. 
JP-UltraTech Cement deal: Stressed lenders to receive about Rs 4,000 croreThe RBI has set a deadline of March 2017 to clean up banks' books. While Jaiprakash has not been declared a defaulter in the technical sense of the term, the company has been lagging behind in payments. 

"The company was not classified as NPA (non-performing asset) but their payments were not happening on due dates which shows that they were strapped for liquidity," said BK Batra, deputy managing director of IDBI Bank. "Therefore, we exerted pressure on the company to sell its entire cement unit to reduce debt. The company has been cooperating by putting up the best of assets on block to reduce debt." 

Banks are being pressed by the Raghuram Rajan-led RBI to clean up their books after stressed loans in the system touched a high of 11.3% of the total. More loans could be classified as rotten and the demand for capital from the government could rise. Analysts estimate that more than Rs 2 lakh crore may be needed in the next three fiscal years to capitalise banks. 

There was a significant increase in bank credit to Jaiprakash Associates in the last three years. Its share in the firm's total debt of more than Rs 29,000 crore at the end of March 2015 stood at 82%, up from 58% in 2012, according to a Morgan Stanley report. 

ICICI's total exposure to the group was at Rs 6,624.2 crore, or 32.8% of the total, at the end of FY15, up from Rs 3,615.3 crore three years earlier. Under the terms of the UltraTech transaction, lenders won't be taking any haircuts even as the deal has been struck at a time when corporates can push lenders to write off a part of their loans to arrive at better valuation. 

Transferring some of their debt to Ultra-Tech means that lenders now have exposure to a business group that's regarded as being financially more sound than many others, thereby reducing the risk of defaults. They can also assign lower capital on the loans as UltraTech is a better rated company. The riskier the borrower, the higher the capital assigned on the loan. 

Among the major financially stressed conglomerates, Jaiprakash Associates has been relatively more cooperative with banks. Others have been delaying asset sales in the hope of an economic recovery and increased cash flow to service debt or, in some cases, bargain for writeoffs. 

The central bank recently identified about 150 companies that are potentially defaulters but banks were yet to declare them as such. More companies could be putting their assets on the block as lenders go after bad loans.

By Sun Capital

India Budget 2016: Winners and Losers

Sun capitalIndia Budget 2016: Winners and Losers
Arun Jaitley, India's finance minister, Jayant Sinha, State finance minister, second right, and other members of the finance ministry in New Delhi, India, on Feb. 29

India’s annual budget is one of the nation’s most closely watched events -- not just for the numbers, but for the political message during a speech that runs for about 90 minutes.
This year rural villagers came away as undisputed winners, with Finance Minister Arun Jaitley announcing plans to "transform India for the benefit of the farmers, the poor and the vulnerable." That was expected: Prime Minister Narendra Modi lost a key state election in November, and faces as many as nine more contests next year. Here are the winners and losers.

WINNERS:

  • Farmers -- pledges to double income of farmers by 2020, allocates 360 billion ($5.3 billion) to agriculture and farmers’ welfare; steps to ensure a greater share of retail food prices reach producers; announces 200-billion-rupee irrigation fund and record 9 trillion in credit for farmers. Affected companies include Shakti Pumps India Ltd., Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd.
  • Poor families -- 100 percent of households to have cooking gas within three years; 100 percent of villages to have electricity by May 1, 2018.
  • State-run banks -- 250 billion rupees to recapitalize government-controlled banks. "If additional capital is required by these banks, we will find the resources for doing so," Jaitley said. “We stand solidly behind these banks." Shares of State Bank of India Ltd. and Bank of Baroda could be affected.
  • India’s biggest commodities exchange -- MCX Ltd. headed for a three-week high on the budget’s proposal to expand foreign direct investment in the exchanges.
  • Housing developers -- 100% deduction in profits for affordable housing projects approved by March 2019. Projects must be built within three years. Shares of DLF Ltd., Unitech Ltd. could benefit.
  • Tax litigants -- one-time dispute resolution scheme for those involved in retrospective tax disputes to pay only arrears; interest, penalty to be waived. Vodafone Group Plc, Cairn India Ltd. could gain.
  • Infrastructure projects -- allocates 2.21 trillion rupees in total outlay for roads, railways and ports. Larsen & Toubro Ltd., India’s biggest engineering company, could see a boost.
  • Energy industry -- "calibrated" market-based pricing to incentivize deep sea hydrocarbon exploration; 30 billion rupees a year to boost nuclear power investment. Reliance Industries Ltd., Oil & Natural Gas Corp., Oil India Ltd. could benefit.
  • Startup Investors -- Profits made after two years of holding exempt from capital gains tax, compared with three years earlier. Move to benefit angel investors, seed funds and other early backers of startups.

LOSERS:

  • The High Rollers -- 1 percent cess on luxury cars valued at 1 million rupees or more; surcharge on income tax raised to 15 percent from 12 percent on those earning 10 million rupees or more a year; additional 10 percent tax on those earning 1 million rupees or more in dividend income.
  • Coal producers -- tax on coal production to double to 400 rupees per ton. Companies affected include NTPC Ltd., Tata Power Co., Adani Power Ltd.
  • Smokers -- taxes on cigarettes to be hiked as much as 15 percent. Affected stocks include ITC Ltd., India’s biggest cigarette maker, and Godfrey Phillips India Ltd.
  • Carmakers -- an infrastructure cess ranging from 1 percent to 4 percent on vehicles to help combat pollution. Shares of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. fell to a 16-month low.
  • Jewelry makers -- Excise duty on jewelry and higher threshold for exempt purchases. Companies affected include Titan Co.

Share it!