RBI releases draft norms for account aggregators

Such NBFCs should have minimum net-owned funds of Rs2 crore and cannot provide any services other than account aggregation

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Thursday released draft guidelines for setting up of non-banking finance companies (NBFC) that would act as account aggregators and provide customers with a single platform view of all their financial holdings across banking, insurance, mutual funds, provident funds and shares.

“At present, persons holding financial assets such as, savings bank deposits, fixed deposits, mutual funds and insurance policies do not get a consolidated view of their financial asset holdings, especially when the entities fall under the purview of different financial sector regulators. Account aggregators would fill this gap by collecting and providing information of customers’ financial assets in a consolidated, organized and retrievable manner to the customer or any other person as per the instructions of the customer,” RBI said in its release.

Such NBFCs should have minimum net-owned funds of Rs.2 crore and cannot provide any services other than account aggregation, the central bank said, adding that the account aggregator cannot support transactions in financial assets. Only NBFCs that have registered with the RBI will be allowed to undertake account aggregation. However, companies that aggregate accounts of only a particular financial sector governed by other regulators can be exempt from seeking RBI approval, the central bank said.

Initially, only financial assets whose records are stored electronically and are under the regulation of the financial sector regulators, namely RBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) and Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) shall be considered for aggregation, the draft norms said.

The NBFCs would provide account aggregation services in response to a specific application by the customer for availing such services and would be backed by appropriate agreements and authorisations, the draft norms said.

“No financial asset-related customer information pulled out by the account aggregator from the financial service providers should reside with the account aggregator,” the central bank said.

Pricing of services would be as per the account aggregator’s board-approved policy, RBI added.

In July 2015, RBI governor Raghuram Rajan had announced the intention of setting up such NBFCs for account aggregation.

The central bank has sought comment and feedback on the draft norms by 18 March.

Sun Capital

Sebi set to get tougher with wilful defaulters

Regulator will make it hard for wilful defaulters to raise funds from public; they can opt for rights issues or share sales to institutional investors

Mumbai: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) will make it difficult for so-called wilful defaulters from raising fresh equity or debt from the public, according to two people familiar with the agenda of the regulator’s next board meeting.

The move will mark yet another effort by the Indian government, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and now Sebi to crack down on the problem of bad loans.

A wilful defaulter is a company or individual who borrowed money and has no intention of paying it back, has diverted the money to some other purpose than the one for which it was borrowed, or has sold the asset acquired or developed with the money without the lender’s knowledge.

Sebi will, however, allow such entities to raise funds through rights issues or share sales to institutional investors, said one of the two persons, asking not to be identified.

The entity will need to disclose itself as a wilful defaulter in the offer document if it chooses to go in for a rights issue (sale of shares to existing shareholders), or a qualified institutional placement, added this person

Sebi’s board meeting is scheduled for 12 March. A Sebi spokesperson did not respond to an email seeking comment.

In January 2015, Sebi issued a draft paper proposing that wilful defaulters would not be allowed to sell shares, debt securities and non-convertible preference redeemable shares to the public.

The paper suggested that wilful defaulters be barred from taking control of another listed entity, but that they be allowed to participate in counter offers to deal with hostile takeover bids.

Each of these restrictions would be applicable if the issuer, its promoter, group company or director of the issuer of such securities were in the list of wilful defaulters published by RBI, the stock market regulator said.

“The final regulations will be based on the discussion paper that dealt with the wilful defaulters,” said the second person, who too asked not to be identified.

In addition to restrictions to fund raising, such entities and persons will be ineligible to serve as market intermediaries or run mutual funds or alternative investment funds, added the second person.

Bankers said such restrictions would help.

RBI has been asking banks to get tough on wilful defaulters and has a tough set of rules in place which say that anyone tagged a wilful defaulter cannot raise fresh funds from the banking system.

The banking regulator, however, has been of the view that such defaulters also need to have their access to capital markets restricted. “If someone has knowingly stopped repaying banks, then why should he be allowed to access the capital markets? Any such limitation on the borrower would definitely be a power for the banks since they can squeeze these wilful defaulters better,” said Ashwani Kumar, chairman and managing director of Dena Bank and chairman of the Indian Banks’ Association.

While RBI has not disclosed the quantum of loans that fall under the wilful default category, data has emerged from some large public sector banks.

Loans worth Rs.11,700 crore given by State Bank of India have been locked up as non-performing assets as nearly 1,160 defaulters have wilfully decided not to repay, PTI reported on 24 February.

Another state-owned lender, Punjab National Bank (PNB), declared 904 borrowers who owed it a combined Rs.10,869.71 crore as of December-end as wilful defaulters. PNB added 140 companies to the list of wilful defaulters in the December quarter alone.

While banks believe that banning wilful defaulters helps their cause, corporate lawyers caution against a sledgehammer approach.

“Wilful defaulters should be restricted from raising funds from public because there is no accountability to return funds to shareholders. However, Sebi should steer clear of a blanket restriction on fund-raising by defaulters as this would potentially limit the chances of a revival of the company and the existing shareholders would end up paying the price,” said Tejesh Chitlangi, a partner at IC Legal.

Parag Bhide, senior associate at Advaya Legal, said Sebi should approach the issue on a case-by-case basis.

“A complete ban on wilful defaulters may not be good for existing shareholders, including retail investors. Further, such a lifetime exile from financial markets may not be constitutional. Ideally, there should be some time limit (three-five years) for such a ban.”

Sun Capital

Banks delayed in declaring Kingfisher as defaulters: CBI

Banks delayed in declaring Kingfisher as defaulters: CBI

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday blamed commercial banks for the delay in declaring Kingfisher Airlines (KFA) and its promoter Vijay Mallya as defaulters.

"The CBI registered a case of cheating and fraud against Kingfisher and its erstwhile management involving allegations of defrauding banks to the tune of Rs 7,000 crore. This case was registered in July 2015, but loans were taken during 2004 to 2012. However, despite our repeated requests, banks did not file a complaint with the CBI. We had to register the case on our own initiative," CBI director Anil Sinha while addressing a conference jointly organised by the Indian Banks Association and the investigating agency.

HT had reported on February 29, 2016 that the RBI was questioning banks for lending Rs 5,253 cr to Kolkata-based REI Agro Ltd after the CBI uncovered fraud.

Sinha cited the example of how the agency's suo moto action against Pearls Agro eventually led to the arrest of the company's chairman.

SBI chairman Arundhati Bhattacharya, who was also present on the occasion, didn't comment on the issue.

SBI, along with other banks, had lent close to Rs 7,000 crore to the UB Group, the parent company of KFA. It was only last month that PNB declared the airline and Mallya wilful defaulters, a claim currently being contested by Mallya.

"While I fully understand that loan defaults can happen due to business risk and reasons beyond control of banks, borrowers and regulators, yet a significant part of the defaults are wilful and fraudulent," Sinha said. "What causes greater concern is that a major part of the NPAs and frauds are in large-value accounts," he said, adding that a large part of such funds moves outside the country to tax havens through unofficial channels.

Gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of banks have gone up from Rs 44,957 crore in 2009 to Rs 3 lakh crore in 2015.

The CBI investigated 171 cases of bank frauds involving Rs 20,646 crore of funds in 2015.

Sun Capital

Will a new credit rating system for infrastructure projects help?

CARE expects the proposed system could help under-development projects with a rating agency stepping in at the pre-bid level of infrastructure projects

Mumbai: Finance minister Arun Jaitley on Monday announced the formation of a new credit rating system for infrastructure projects in the country for better credit enhancement.

A new credit rating system for infrastructure projects will give “emphasis to various in-built credit enhancement structures… instead of relying upon a standard perception of risk which often result in mispriced loans,” the budget statement said.

The intent seems to be to help infrastructure projects access credit from multiple sources and at better rates. However, it is unclear how the new system would be different from the existing credit rating scale put in place by credit rating agencies. It is also unclear whether the proposed rating system would be for operational projects or under-development projects or both.

“I have not seen the details, but if I draw a comparison with the banking rating system, how will it be different? Has the existing banking rating system helped?” asked a former government official, who has been closely associated to road project financing, but did not want to be named.

There are no clear answers as of now.

D.R. Dogra, managing director and chief executive officer of Credit Analysis and Research Ltd (CARE), expects the proposed credit rating system could help under-development projects with a rating agency stepping in at the pre-bid level of infrastructure projects. “A rating agency can help identify issues which lead to a lower rating at the pre-bid stage, which can then be addressed before private bids are invited,” said Dogra, adding that he is not aware of the details of the proposed credit rating system as it has not been discussed with rating agencies yet.

Not all are of the same view though.

A top official from another rating agency points out the new announcement speaks about credit enhancement. “Credit enhancement measures are taken only once the infrastructure projects are operational. This is the point where a refinancing can happen and bank credit can be replaced with bonds. A better rating makes the bonds market accessible in a better way,” he said. He refused to be identified as the agency is not aware what the actual fine print of the credit rating system would be.

Infrastructure consultant Vinayak Chatterjee, chairman for Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd, is positive the new credit rating system would help the sector as the traditional rating methods do not fully take into account the risk in an infrastructure project which changes at different stages of the project life-cycle.

Even as the industry waits for details, a former rating agency official, who did not want to be named, said, “Need more clarity (on the details of the system), but mostly it would be inconsequential.”

DCB Bank buys 5.81% stake in Annapurna Microfinance

Deal values the micro lender at Rs 172 crore. 

DCB Bank Ltd has acquired a 5.81 per cent stake in Odisha­based Annapurna Microfinance Pvt Ltd for Rs 9.99 crore (about $1.5 million). 

The move strengthens the business partnership between the two companies, Murli M Natrajan, managing director and CEO at DCB Bank, said in a statement filed to stock exchanges. DCB’s microfinance initiatives help it achieve its financial inclusion goals, he added. 

DCB, formally known as Development Credit Bank, was founded in 1995. It has 176 branches in 17 states and two union territories in India. 

Gobinda Pattnaik, managing director at Annapurna Microfinance, said the transaction will help it strive forward to achieve its goal of serving the financially underserved. “This capital infusion is a mandate for growth,” he said. 

Annapurna focuses on rural locations of Odisha, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh. It has 14 branches each in Odisha and Madhya Pradesh and six in Chhattisgarh. It has half a million members and assets under management of Rs 720 crore

The latest transaction values Annapurna at Rs 172 crore. The firm had earlier also raised funding. In April last year, it secured Rs 25 crore in a Series C round of funding from Samridhi Fund, which is managed by SIDBI Venture Capital Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of state-run SIDBI and an existing investor in the firm. 

In 2014, the microlender raised Rs 30 crore in a Series B round of funding led by Belgian Investment Company for Developing Countries, with participation from the existing investor Incofin Investment Management's Rural Impulse Fund II.

The firm posted total income of Rs 61.61 crore for the six-month period ended September 20, 2015, up from Rs 22.69 crore a year earlier, according to its half-yearly audit report. Net profit jumped to Rs 6.85 crore from Rs 58 lakh.

Sun Capital Services

GE to sell India financial services biz to Aion, former execs

The transaction represents about USD 400 million in ending net investment and includes businesses such as auto leasing, healthcare financing and corporate lending and leasing. 

General Electric Co said it would sell its India commercial lending and leasing businesses to a consortium of former GE Capital executives and Aion Capital Partners as it looks to trim itself and focus on its industrial businesses. 

The transaction represents about USD 400 million in ending net investment and includes businesses such as auto leasing, healthcare financing and corporate lending and leasing. Employees would also be transferred to the buyer, the company said. 

Aion has partnered with former GE Capital executives Pramod Bhasin and Anil Chawla for the acquisition. Bhasin was formerly the head of GE Capital in India and Asia. Chawla was the head of the commercial business operations of GE Capital India. 

Aion is a joint venture between ICICI Venture and Apollo Global Management.

Sun Capital Services

India on course for recovery: IMF report

Pegs GDP growth at 7.5% for FY17; expects private investmentto pick up

New Delhi, March 2:  

In a thumbs-up to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s financial management, the International Monetary Fund has said that the Indian economy is on the path to recovery, helped by low crude oil prices, improving current account and fiscal deficits, as well as a sharp fall in inflation.

However, in its India: 2016 Article IV Consultation report, the IMF has pegged the country’s growth rate at 7.3 per cent this fiscal and 7.5 per cent for the next. This is marginally lower than Jaitley’s official estimate of 7.6 per cent GDP growth in 2015-16 and 7-7.75 per cent in 2016-17.

“The Indian economy is on a recovery path, helped by a large terms of trade gain (about 2.5 per cent of GDP), positive policy actions, and reduced external vulnerabilities,” said the report, which is based on the IMF’s consultations with officials from the Finance Ministry and the Reserve Bank of India.

With some uptick in industrial activity, the Washington-based international lender also expects a pick-up in private investment to help broaden the economic recovery.

The report has, however, warned that a number of economic risks remain. On the external front, it has highlighted a possible disruption from increased volatility in global markets, unexpected developments in US monetary policy and China’s slowdown.

On the domestic front, the IMF has listed the weakness in corporate financial positions and bad loans of banks, as well as the delay in reforms as risks that could weigh on growth, accelerate inflation and undermine sentiment.

“On the upside, further structural reforms could lead to stronger growth, as would a sustained period of low global energy prices,” it said.

The report also stressed the need for continued vigilance, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, and sustained reforms to enhance the resilience of the economy and bolster potential growth.

Essential reforms

It said reform priorities include removing supply-side bottlenecks, especially in the agricultural and power sectors, and facilitating land acquisition. “Further reforms are also essential to boost employment in the formal sector, encourage female labour force participation, and enhance labour market flexibility more broadly,” said the IMF.

The report welcomed the adoption of flexible inflation targeting and the progress in enhancing monetary policy transmission, and said the RBI should be ready to tighten the monetary stance, if required, to control inflation.

Sun Capital Services

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp to sell stake in Kotak Mahindra Bank

Sumitomo Mitsui is looking to sell almost half of its stake in Kotak Mahindra Bank for around $300 million

Shares of Kotak Mahindra Bank closed at Rs.630.25 on the BSE, up by 2.35%, while the benchmark Sensex closed at 23,002 points, down by 0.66%, on a day the stock markets witnessed volatile trading on account of the announcement of the union budget.

Mumbai: Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. is looking to sell almost half of its stake in private sector lender Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd, for around $300 million (approximately Rs.2,050 crore), according to two people aware of the development.

As of 31 December, Sumitomo held a 3.58% stake in the private-sector lender, data from stock exchanges show.

“The book has been launched and the sale is expected to close overnight,” said one of the two people mentioned above, requesting anonymity as he is not authorized to speak to the media.

Large domestic and foreign institutions have shown interest in buying the stake in block trade, he added.

Shares are being offered to buyers in a price range of Rs.611.34 to Rs.636.55 per share, according to Bloomberg. Citigroup Inc. is managing the share sale program, the report added. After the transaction, Sumitomo’s stake in the bank will fall to around 1.79%.

The Japanese bank firm had picked up a 4.5% stake in Kotak Mahindra Bank in 2010 through a preferential allotment for Rs.1,366 crore.

Shares of Kotak Mahindra Bank closed at Rs.630.25 on the BSE, up by 2.35%, while the benchmark Sensex closed at 23,002 points, down by 0.66%, on a day the stock markets witnessed volatile trading on account of the announcement of the Union budget.

Also, on Monday, California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest pension fund in the US, sold a stake worth around Rs.870 crore (approximately $127 million) in Axis Bank Ltd, according to data at stock exchanges.

Foreign institutional investor (FII) Genesis Indian Investment Co. Ltd bought the stake (around 0.94%) at a price of Rs.387.5 per share.

Last month Genesis bought a stake worth Rs.318 crore in Dabur India Ltd through an open market transaction, according to information on stock exchanges. The FII bought about 12.7 million shares, or a 0.72% stake, in Dabur.

In 2015, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, had assets under management of $298 billion, according to Preqin, a private equity database.

Shares of Axis Bank closed at Rs.375.25 on the BSE, down by 2.75%.

Sun Capital

Budget 2016: Growth-oriented Budget

Amidst global challenges, the finance minister has presented a very prudent growth-oriented Budget without walking away from the fiscal deficit reduction road map.

Amidst global challenges, the finance minister has presented a very prudent growth-oriented Budget without walking away from the fiscal deficit reduction road map. This also opens up a window for the Reserve Bank of India to bring down interest rates further and expect at least one rate cut very soon.

Substantial investment of Rs 97,000 crore has been allocated for road sector. It is also been said that the government has decided to add 50,000 km of road length to the existing national highway network. This will create more development opportunities in the years to come.

To revitalise projects under public- private partnership (PPP) model, two significant steps have been taken which include issuance of guidelines for renegotiation of PPP concession agreements in a transparent manner, and new credit rating system for infrastructure projects to be issued.

Due to creation of new credit rating system, the benefits accruing to infrastructure projects will be better appreciated, resulting in a better rating. This will help infrastructure developers tap bond market and because of better rating of projects, insurance and pension funds will be able to come forward to fund these projects.

Another significant step for a progressive public-private partnership  project frame work is making Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvIT) structure investor friendly.

In this regard, now distribution made out of income of special purpose vehicle to the REITs and InvITs having specified shareholding, will not be subjected to dividend distribution tax, in respect of dividend distributed after the specified date. With this change the long pending demand of investors will stand addressed and Infrastructure Investment Trusts can now become a success story.

The Budget will have a good impact on boosting domestic demand, which will help the overall economic growth. Renewed impetus to irrigation is also a very welcome move. The Budget talks about implementation of 89 irrigation projects under AIBP which were languishing for a longer time and fast tracking of the same.

The overall allocation for rural sector and agriculture sector will also help the growth to pick up substantially. Renewed focus on initiatives like skill development, Make in India and incentives associated with the same in the Budget will result in good amount of employment generation.

The only disappointment in the Budget proposal is with regards to double taxation of dividend income, and would have been good if the same could have been avoided.

Sun Capital

Why Morgan Stanley’s action on Flipkart is bad news for Indian unicorns

Given that Flipkart is expected to list its shares in the US at some point over the next few years, the valuation estimates of the mutual funds will be an important indicator of how stock market investors will value the company.

Bengaluru/New Delhi: Late last month, Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd, the country’s largest and most valuable Internet company, got a taste of the exacting standards of US stock markets, where it hopes to list.

On Friday, Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust, a minority investor in Flipkart, disclosed a write-down in the value of its holdings in the company by as much as 27%. The mutual fund reported the number in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the US stock markets regulator.

Flipkart was valued at $15 billion when it received $700 million from Tiger Global Management, Qatar Investment Authority and other investors in June.

That was its fourth round of fund-raising in a year. Its valuation shot up roughly fivefold from $2.5-3 billion in May 2014.

Morgan Stanley’s latest estimate implies the mutual fund now values Flipkart at $11 billion.

The markdown is significant not only because it proves that Flipkart’s valuation had run ahead of itself, but also because mutual funds comprise one of the largest institutional buyers of shares in stock markets.

At least two other mutual funds, T. Rowe Price and Baillie Gifford, are investors in Flipkart. T. Rowe Price hasn’t yet reported the latest estimated value of its stake in the company.

Given that Flipkart is expected to list its shares in the US at some point over the next few years, the valuation estimates of the mutual funds will be an important indicator of how stock market investors will value the company. Flipkart declined to comment for this story.

Flipkart is hardly the only unicorn, a term that is used to describe start-ups that are valued at more than $1 billion, to have its value marked down by mutual fund investors.

Along with cutting the value of its stake in Flipkart, Morgan Stanley also reduced the worth of its holdings in file storage company Dropbox Inc. and data analytics company Palantir Technologies Inc. Late last year, mutual funds owned by T. Rowe Price, Fidelity and BlackRock cut the worth of their holdings in US unicorns en masse.

BlackRock is also an investor in online marketplace Snapdeal (Jasper Infotech Pvt. Ltd), which raised roughly $50 million last month at a valuation of $6.5 billion. BlackRock’s next filing on Snapdeal will be closely watched to see if other Indian unicorns will be marked down, too.

Snapdeal’s $50 million fund-raising, which was accompanied by $150 million in share sales by existing Snapdeal investors to new shareholders, took more than six months to close, primarily because there are not too many takers for India’s top e-commerce firms at their current valuations. The $50 million fund-raising was also significantly smaller than what online retailers typically seek from investors.

Mint reported on 4 February that China’s Alibaba Group is in early talks to buy a stake in Flipkart and increase its holding in Snapdeal. The talks are at a very initial stage and the likelihood of a deal is a function of Flipkart’s willingness to offer a discount on its current valuation of $15 billion, Mint had reported then.

“Our valuation has grown steadily between our last two funding rounds,” a Snapdeal spokesperson said.

There are two broad concerns about the valuations of Flipkart and Snapdeal. One, whether they will ever be able to cut their ballooning losses without sacrificing sales growth. Two, whether they will lose out to the Indian unit of Amazon.com Inc., the world’s largest online retailer.

Over the course of 2015, Amazon gained market share in India at the expense of both Flipkart and Snapdeal, according to publicly available data and several company executives.

Future estimates by mutual funds of their holdings in Flipkart and Snapdeal—and these companies’ eventual IPOs—will depend a lot on these two factors.

“Growing at negative operating margins to raise money in quick succession is a destructive style of doing business,” said Kashyap Deorah, serial entrepreneur and author of The Golden Tap, a book on India’s hyper-funded start-up ecosystem. “It kills the ecosystem... to build a thriving long-term business environment, we need to get off the addiction of global funds buying market spaces in India like territory.”

Deorah predicts Flipkart’s valuation will eventually slump to the amount it has invested. Flipkart has raised anywhere between $3 billion and $3.5 billion. “The downward trend will continue until Flipkart’s valuation equals invested capital,” he said.

To be sure, Deorah’s prediction seems extreme.

Flipkart is still the largest e-commerce firm in the last remaining big e-commerce market in the world. It has a solid brand, a strong leadership team and deep-pocketed investors, among other strengths.

“Flipkart’s valuation may look stretched at $15 billion in this current environment, but you can’t take away the fact that the company still has a solid business,” a Flipkart investor said on condition of anonymity. “In the worst-case scenario, it may take the company a year or two to grow into that valuation. But it will definitely happen. And if the market sentiment becomes better, it will happen sooner.”

By Sun Capital

Publish list of loan defaulters, AIBEA asks Centre

Suncapital.co.in: All India Bank Employees Association today urged the government to publish a list of defaulters, who had failed to repay loans worth over Rs 100 crore.

Responding to a question on the expectations of bank employees from the general budget to be presented tomorrow, AIBEA General Secretary C H Venkatachalam told reporters here that the banking sector was awaiting implementation of reforms for the betterment of bank services.

The government should offer loans to farmers at lower interest rates, so that the sector could again contribute substantially to the GDP, he said.
The banks, which were lending money with small savings of Rs 90 lakh crore, should open five lakh branches in the rural areas, where there were no branches, Venkatachalam suggested.
As the government was attempting to waive NPAs, reportedly worth about Rs 2 lakh crore, it should come up with a defaulters' list who had failed to repay their loans and book a criminal case and initiate stringent action against them, he said while referring to the reports that business tycoon Vijay Mallya, who owed thousand of crores rupees to several banks, was allegedly planning to leave India.

By Suncapital.co.in

Budget 2016: Jaitley walks a tightrope to fund infrastructure

Suncapital: Budget 2016: Jaitley walks a tightrope to fund infrastructure.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley’s third Union budget had a theme—Transform India. And while reading out the budget speech, Jaitley termed infrastructure and investment as the fifth support pillar of the theme championed by the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government.

Given that infrastructure forms the backbone of the government’s flagship programmes such as Make in India, the budget announced a higher public spending to support infrastructure development.

The total outlay for infrastructure announced in the budget for 2016-17 is Rs2.21 trillion compared with Rs1.80 trillion in revised estimates for 2015-16. With NDAs focus on improving the country's transportation architecture, Rs2.18 trillion has been earmarked for roads and railways for the financial year 2016-17.

With tepid private investment due to a slowdown in emerging and developed markets coupled with weak domestic earnings by companies, public spending was required to keep the momentum going. However, the dilemma faced by the government was how to balance the spending and stick to the fiscal deficit targets of 3.5% of the gross domestic product (GDP) for 2015-16 and 3.9% for 2016-17.


The government decided to stick to the targets while creating space for infrastructure spending.

“We wish to enhance expenditure in the farm and rural sector, the social sector, the infrastructure sector and provide for recapitalization of the banks. This will address those sectors which need immediate attention,” Jaitley announced while laying the roadmap for the third year of Prime Minister Narendra Modi led government.

The Union budget proposed a capital expenditure of Rs1.21 trillion for the railways. This will support the national carrier which has mostly relied on monetising its assets and funding projects through external financing, as announced by the railway minister Suresh Prabhu on 25 February.

The government also earmarked Rs27,000 crore for Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna and

Rs55,000 crore for roads and highways. Additionally, Rs15,000 crore is to be raised through bonds issued by National Highways Authority of India (NHAI).

“Our goal is to advance the completion target of the programme from 2021 to 2019 and connect the remaining 65,000 eligible habitations by constructing 2.23 lakh km of roads,” Jaitley said.

He also announced that contracts for constructing nearly 10,000km of national highways will be awarded in 2016-17.In addition, around 50,000km of state highways will be upgraded as national highways.

This allocation towards physical infrastructure projects comes in the backdrop of twin balance sheet problem as articulated by the Economic Survey—the stressed financial positions of staterun banks and some business houses.

Experts agree with the government’s strategy.

“Given the fiscal deficit constraint, I think the numbers for infrastructure announced today look good. There has been a hike of 20-30% in capital expenditure,” said Abhaya Agarwal, partner and public private partnership leader, EY.

Agarwal added that too much capital expenditure at one shot is not desirable given that one may end up investing in projects not worthy enough and lose market value.

An analysis of December quarter results of all staterun bank by news agency Press Trust of India shows that the cumulative gross nonperforming assets of 24 listed public sector banks, including market leader State Bank of India and its associates, stood at Rs3.93 trillion as on 31 December 2015.

As part of the comprehensive infrastructure development plan, the budget also focused on developing ports and airports.

“We are planning to develop new greenfield ports both in the eastern and western coasts of the country. The work on the National Waterways is also being expedited and Rs800 crore has been provided for these initiatives,” said Jaitley, while adding that the Airport Authority of India will revive the unutilised and underutilised airstrips across the country in partnership with state governments.

To provide further impetus to mobilise funds for infrastructure spending, a total of Rs31,300 crore will be allowed to be raised through bonds issued by NHAI, Power Finance Corp. Ltd, Rural Electrification Corp. Ltd and Inland Water Authority, among others.

Making public private partnership (PPP) as its pivot to attract private sector investment, the budget announced the government’s intent is to introduce a Public Utility (Resolution of Disputes) Bill and also guidelines for renegotiation of PPP concession contracts.

“A new credit rating system for infrastructure projects which gives emphasis to various inbuilt

credit enhancement structures will be developed, instead of relying upon a standard perception of risk which often results in mispriced loans,” Jaitley said.

Infrastructure development is necessary for realising a GDP growth of 7-7.5% for the next fiscal as projected by the Economic Survey released on 26 February. The Survey added that India could achieve a growth rate of 8-10% going forward.

“The government spending capacity cannot be increased overnight. So, taking into account other related announcements for ease of doing business and resolve to implement goods and services tax, the infrastructure sector is poised to gain,” said EY’s Agarwal.

Sun Capital Advisory Service

Two downgrades a day put India Inc in trouble

Suncapital: At two downgrades a day, the quality of India Inc’s debt is fast deteriorating. Thanks to160 downward revisions in the last two months alone, the tally since April 2015 has crossed 655 companies; metals, power, construction and infrastructure players lead the pack. And between January and now, rating agencies have made at least 13 revisions across seven state-owned lenders.

Jindal Steel and Power(JSPL), which owes lenders Rs 42,000 crore, is now rated below investment grade by CRISIL with the firm’s long and short-term credit rating now down by three to four notches. In mid-February, Moody’s lowered the long-term corporate family rating of Tata Steel by two notches to Ba3; soon thereafter, S&P revised downwards the grade of Vedanta Resources’ long-term foreign issuer credit rating to B, the fourth time this fiscal, citing increased pressure on liquidity as the firm attempts to refinance $1.35 billion of borrowings.

Moody’s lowered its outlook on Delhi International Airport Private Ltd’s Ba1 corporate family rating and senior secured ratings to ‘negative’, citing the impact of a new tariff order by the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA). It estimated that the new tariff guideline, applicable over 2016-2019, will lead to a decrease in annual aeronautical revenues by about R2,000 crore, or around 70%, from FY17 onwards. Among others for whom the outlook has been lowered to ‘negative’ are BHEL, DLF, Lodha Developers, Tata Tele Services and Shree Renuka Sugars.

As many as 16 sugar companies and 22 textile-linked companies have also seen rating revisions, as have several key infrastructure projects based on tariff changes or lower traffic volumes.

Given the dire situation that the steel sector is in, it’s not surprising that as many as 20 steel-producing and processing companies have been downgraded to ‘D’ or default rating in FY16 so far, according to Bloomberg data. The proportion of corporate debt owed by stressed companies, defined as those whose earnings are insufficient to cover their interest obligations, has increased to 41% in December, 2015, up from 35% in December 2014.

ICRA revised its outlook on the long-term rating of Mumbai Metro One, a special purpose vehicle (SPV) of Reliance Infrastructure, with two other entities, from stable to negative citing the shortfall in cash flow position of the project, resulting from lower than estimated actual daily passenger volume.

CRISIL Ratings identifies two clear trends in credit quality that have emerged over the past one year. The debt-weighted credit ratio, or the ratio of quantum of debt upgraded to that downgraded, is at its lowest level in nearly three years. This is because some large corporates — whose fortunes are linked to commodity and investment cycles — or those which are highly leveraged, remain stressed. What’s positive is that several mid-sized and smaller firms have seen an improvement in credit quality, with upgrades higher than downgrades, and the credit ratio touching a four-year high in the first half of fiscal 2015-16.

However, as demand slow-down and leveraged balance sheets of some Indian corporates limit their spending capacity, the cascading impact may not be ruled out even on smaller companies.

In a recent interaction , Bharat Iyer, MD & Head of Research at JP Morgan, pointed out that the de-leveraging cycle is taking longer in the absence of a revival in earnings and the inability of companies to raise equity. Which is why although the NPL cycle looks like it’s closer to the bottom, it could be some time away from turning. “Apart from sectors such as real estate, infrastructure and resources, there is also stress in the SMEs linked to these sectors,” Iyer added.

CRISIL had downgraded debt worth R2.4 lakh crore in the six months to September with the the debt-weighted credit ratio for a set of 1,441 companies — for which ratings were altered — falling to 0.27 times. For FY15, this ratio stood at 0.62 times. For FY16, a further deterioration in the gauge cannot be ruled out as companies struggle to make ends meet.

The metals and mining was clearly the worst affected space given that almost a quarter of default ratings belonged to such entities.

Ratings plunge

* Ratings for 655 firms downgraded since April 2015

* JSPL rated below investment grade, owes lenders R42,000 crore

* Tata Steel downgraded two notches to Ba3 by Moody’s

* Vedanta Resources downgraded by S&P to B

* Dial’s outlook lowered to ‘negative’ by Moody’s

* Outlook for BHEL, DLF, Lodha, TTSL, Shree Renuka Sugars lowered to ‘negative’

* 13 revisions for seven PSBs since January

Sun Capital Advisory Services

Indiabulls Real Estate Fund invests Rs125 cr in Mumbai project

Suncapital.co.in: With this deal, the fund has deployed almost 90% of its capital; remaining Rs50 crore to be deployed through another transaction

Indiabulls Real Estate Fund (IREF) has invested Rs.125 crore in an upcoming residential project in south Mumbai, its fourth transaction from the fund.

IREF, the first of the several real estate-focused funds managed by Indiabulls Asset Management Co. Ltd, made the investment in the form of structured debt in a project by the Shree Naman Group. With this, the fund has deployed almost 90% of its capital. It has invested Rs.100 crore each in projects of Supertech Ltd and Vatika Group in the National Capital Region (NCR) and Rs.125 crore in Sheth Creators Pvt. Ltd’s project in Mumbai during the course of last year, after launching its fund in February 2015.

The remaining Rs.50 crore will be deployed through another transaction. In line with its proposed strategy, IREF has invested in approved, under-construction and upcoming residential projects with visible sales, primarily in key property markets.

The investments have been done via the non-convertible debentures (NCDs) route.

“It was a successful first attempt by the fund. In 2016, deployment of capital by fund managers like us will be done with a little more caution. Cost of borrowing of developers have come down with a lot of liquidity in the market and there is a lot of pressure to deploy, but we will invest carefully,” said Ambar Maheshwari, chief executive– private equity, Indiabulls Asset Management Co. Ltd.

Jayesh Shah, chairman of Sree Naman Group, confirmed raising debt for an upcoming project and said the money will be used for project development.

In a month’s time or so, IREF plans to launch a second fund to raise another Rs.500 crore from domestic investors to invest in residential projects this year.

In the last couple of years, India’s real estate sector has witnessed a steady fall in home sales and a rise in unsold inventory.

Private equity (PE) funds and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) have come to the rescue of many developers who needed capital to refinance loans, kick off projects or for last mile financing for ongoing projects.

“While there are ample investment opportunities in real estate, our measured and calibrated investment strategy of choosing top developers and their quality under-construction projects, has worked and will result in superior returns for our investors,” said Akshay Gupta, group executive head and chief executive officer, Indiabulls Asset Management Co. Ltd.

In 2015, PE funds invested nearly $2.77 billion in real estate projects and companies across 81 deals against $2.1 billion in 2014 through 90 deals, according to data from VCCEdge, which tracks investments. Demand for capital among developers continues to remain high this year as well.

“Fund-raising and deployment are both challenging in tough times. Fund-raising process for most funds has become a longer process as investors carry out a more rigorous due diligence process before committing capital,” said Shashank Jain, partner, transaction services, Pricewaterho\useCoopers India. “Deploying is tough because funds need to choose the best projects and developers, when they give out money when the sector is going through a rough patch.”

by Suncapital.co.in