Friday, 4 March 2016

10 Tips for the Successful Long-Term Investor

While it may be true that in the stock market there is no rule without an exception, there are some principles that are tough to dispute. Let's review 10 general principles to help investors get a better grasp of how to approach the market from a long-term view. Every point embodies some fundamental concept every investor should know.



1. Sell the Losers and Let the Winners Ride!

Time and time again, investors take profits by selling their appreciated investments, but they hold onto stocks that have declined in the hope of a rebound. If an investor doesn't know when it's time to let go of hopeless stocks, he or she can, in the worst-case scenario, see the stock sink to the point where it is almost worthless. Of course, the idea of holding onto high-quality investments while selling the poor ones is great in theory, but hard to put into practice. The following information might help:
  • Riding a Winner - Peter Lynch was famous for talking about "tenbaggers", or investments that increased tenfold in value. The theory is that much of his overall success was due to a small number of stocks in his portfolio that returned big. If you have a personal policy to sell after a stock has increased by a certain multiple - say three, for instance - you may never fully ride out a winner. No one in the history of investing with a "sell-after-I-have-tripled-my-money" mentality has ever had a tenbagger. Don't underestimate a stock that is performing well by sticking to some rigid personal rule - if you don't have a good understanding of the potential of your investments, your personal rules may end up being arbitrary and too limiting.

  • Selling a Loser - There is no guarantee that a stock will bounce back after a protracted decline. While it's important not to underestimate good stocks, it's equally important to be realistic about investments that are performing badly. Recognizing your losers is hard because it's also an acknowledgment of your mistake. But it's important to be honest when you realize that a stock is not performing as well as you expected it to. Don't be afraid to swallow your pride and move on before your losses become even greater.
In both cases, the point is to judge companies on their merits according to your research. In each situation, you still have to decide whether a price justifies future potential. Just remember not to let your fears limit your returns or inflate your losses.

2. Don't Chase a "Hot Tip."

Whether the tip comes from your brother, your cousin, your neighbor or even your broker, you shouldn't accept it as law. When you make an investment, it's important you know the reasons for doing so; do your own research and analysis of any company before you even consider investing your hard-earned money. Relying on a tidbit of information from someone else is not only an attempt at taking the easy way out, it's also a type of gambling. Sure, with some luck, tips sometimes pan out. But they will never make you an informed investor, which is what you need to be to be successful in the long run.

3. Don't Sweat the Small Stuff.
As a long-term investor, you shouldn't panic when your investments experience short-term movements. When tracking the activities of your investments, you should look at the big picture. Remember to be confident in the quality of your investments rather than nervous about the inevitable volatility of the short term. Also, don't overemphasize the few cents difference you might save from using a limit versus market order.
Granted, active traders will use these day-to-day and even minute-to-minute fluctuations as a way to make gains. But the gains of a long-term investor come from a completely different market movement - the one that occurs over many years - so keep your focus on developing your overall investment philosophy by educating yourself.

4. Don't Overemphasize the P/E Ratio.

Investors often place too much importance on the price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio). Because it is one key tool among many, using only this ratio to make buy or sell decisions is dangerous and ill-advised. The P/E ratio must be interpreted within a context, and it should be used in conjunction with other analytical processes. So, a low P/E ratio doesn't necessarily mean a security is undervalued, nor does a high P/E ratio necessarily mean a company is overvalued.


5. Resist the Lure of Penny Stocks.

A common misconception is that there is less to lose in buying a low-priced stock. But whether you buy a $5 stock that plunges to $0 or a $75 stock that does the same, either way you've lost 100% of your initial investment. A lousy $5 company has just as much downside risk as a lousy $75 company. In fact, a penny stock is probably riskier than a company with a higher share price, which would have more regulations placed on it.


6. Pick a Strategy and Stick With It.

Different people use different methods to pick stocks and fulfill investing goals. There are many ways to be successful and no one strategy is inherently better than any other. However, once you find your style, stick with it. An investor who flounders between different stock-picking strategies will probably experience the worst, rather than the best, of each. Constantly switching strategies effectively makes you a market timer, and this is definitely territory most investors should avoid. Take Warren Buffett's actions during the dotcom boom of the late '90s as an example. Buffett's value-oriented strategy had worked for him for decades, and - despite criticism from the media - it prevented him from getting sucked into tech startups that had no earnings and eventually crashed.


7. Focus on the Future.

The tough part about investing is that we are trying to make informed decisions based on things that have yet to happen. It's important to keep in mind that even though we use past data as an indication of things to come, it's what happens in the future that matters most.
A quote from Peter Lynch's book "One Up on Wall Street" (1990) about his experience with Subaru demonstrates this: "If I'd bothered to ask myself, 'How can this stock go any higher?' I would have never bought Subaru after it already went up twenty-fold. But I checked the fundamentals, realized that Subaru was still cheap, bought the stock, and made seven-fold after that." The point is to base a decision on future potential rather than on what has already happened in the past.

8. Adopt a Long-Term Perspective.

Large short-term profits can often entice those who are new to the market. But adopting a long-term horizon and dismissing the "get in, get out and make a killing" mentality is a must for any investor. This doesn't mean that it's impossible to make money by actively trading in the short term. But, as we already mentioned, investing and trading are very different ways of making gains from the market. Trading involves very different risks that buy-and-hold investors don't experience. As such, active trading requires certain specialized skills.

Neither investing style is necessarily better than the other - both have their pros and cons. But active trading can be wrong for someone without the appropriate time, financial resources, education and desire.


9. Be Open-Minded.

Many great companies are household names, but many good investments are not household names. Thousands of smaller companies have the potential to turn into the large blue chips of tomorrow. In fact, historically, small-caps have had greater returns than large-caps; over the decades from 1926-2001, small-cap stocks in the U.S. returned an average of 12.27% while the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) returned 10.53%.

This is not to suggest that you should devote your entire portfolio to small-cap stocks. Rather, understand that there are many great companies beyond those in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), and that by neglecting all these lesser-known companies, you could also be neglecting some of the biggest gains.

10. Be Concerned About Taxes, but Don't Worry.

Putting taxes above all else is a dangerous strategy, as it can often cause investors to make poor, misguided decisions. Yes, tax implications are important, but they are a secondary concern. The primary goals in investing are to grow and secure your money. You should always attempt to minimize the amount of tax you pay and maximize your after-tax return, but the situations are rare where you'll want to put tax considerations above all else when making an investment decision.


The Bottom Line

There are exceptions to every rule, but we hope that these solid tips for long-term investors and the common-sense principles we've discussed benefit you overall and provide some insight into how you should think about investing. If you are looking for more information about long term investing, Investopedia's Ask an Advisor tackles the topic by answering one of our user questions.

Sun Capital

Budget 2016: Impact on alternative fund industry.

In the backdrop of slow global growth, turbulent financial markets and volatile exchange rates,one may say that expectations from the Union Budget 2016 were overall low. Amid a need to maintain fiscal discipline and with limited avenues to mobilise additional resources (except by increasing taxes), aspects like no substantial increase in service tax, no change in the structure of taxation for listed securities and no change in extension in holding period for an asset to qualify as longterm capital asset, all are signs of relief and indicators of a stable regime.

Having said that, the alternative fund industry, being the source of risk capital for Indian
entrepreneurs, had significant expectations from the Budget. They were hoping that the
government will significantly accept the recommendations of the Alternative Investment Policy Advisory Committee (AIPAC) formed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) under the chairmanship of NR Narayana Murthy. In fact, the report had a chapter dedicated to tax reforms required for the alternative funds industry.

While many of those recommendations could have been accepted, the Budget proposals fell
short of expectations in this regard. However, some proposals relevant to the alternative fund industry made their way and are summarized below: Withholding tax on distributions by Alternative Investment Funds (AIF): It is proposed that distribution of income by AIFs to nonresident investors shall not be subject to 10 per cent withholding tax provided such nonresident investor is eligible for tax treaty benefits.

This proposal will be warmly welcomed by the AIFs, specifically, the fund managers based in India, who were looking to raise capital from offshore investors, to capitalise on the recent FDI liberalisation allowing 100 per cent FDI in AIFs under the automatic route. However, it would have helped if the government had taken distributions to exempt resident investors or distributions of exempt income to residents out of 10 per cent tax withholding.

Applicable longterm capital gains tax rate to foreign funds: The issue of applicability of
reduced rate of 10 per cent tax on longterm capital gains arising on transfer of unlisted
securities for nonresidents is proposed to be resolved. It is proposed that such rate shall be
available on longterm capital gains derived on transfer of unlisted securities or shares of
company in which public is not substantially interested. While taxation of gains arising to most of the foreign funds would be protected under the applicable tax treaty, this amendment should help foreign funds in tax indemnity related discussions on exits.

Reduction in holding period: In another welcome move, the finance minister said that the
holding period of securities of unlisted companies to be treated as longterm capital asset is
proposed to be reduced from three to two years. However, enabling provisions to enact such amendment in the law seems to have been missed out.

Safe harbor rules largely unchanged: Allowing onshore asset management of offshore pool of capital has been a key demand of the alternative fund industry for more than three years. If enacted, the amendment will help the government not only in restricting export of intellectual capital but also raise additional revenues by way of income tax on fund management fees.

While two small amendments have been made (explained below), a lot was expected about
investment diversification, investor diversification and provisions relating to arm’s length
management fees. One hopes that these will be dealt through a separate notification for which the law provides for – though this needs some sense of urgency.

(i) Safe harbor rules were applicable to an eligible investment fund resident of a country /
specified association, with which India has entered into a double taxation avoidance agreement.

This section is proposed to be amended to also include a country which may be notified by the government. Here also instead of a country to be notified, what the industry expects is that the fund could be set up or established or incorporated in the countries with which India has a tax treaty.

(ii) Currently, an eligible investment fund is not permitted to carry on or control and manage,
directly or indirectly, any business in India or from India. This condition is now proposed to be restricted to controlling any business in India and not from India.
Place of Effective Management (POEM) effective from April 1, 2016: In order to provide clarity for implementation of the POEMbased residency test and also to address concerns of the stakeholders, it is proposed to defer the applicability of such rule by a year. However, it is expected that the government will soon finalise the detailed guidelines relating to determination of POEM for effective implementation.

MAT on foreign companies: With a view to provide certainty in taxation of foreign companies, it is proposed that MAT provisions shall not apply to foreign companies if it is from a treaty country and does not have a permanent establishment in India or it is not from a treaty country and is not required to register under the Companies Act.

New asset classes: Probably the last hurdle from tax standpoint for REIT/ InvIT, is proposed to be cleared in this Budget. Once enacted, dividend received by an REIT / InvIT from wholly owned special purpose vehicles (SPV) shall not be taxable in the hands of the trust nor will it be subject to dividend distribution tax (DDT) in the hands of the SPV.

Similarly, a new taxation regime for securitisation trusts and its investors has been provided.
Amongst others, tax passthrough status has been provided to income of securitisation trust
and income from securitisation trust would be taxable in the hands of investors. Further, 100
per cent FDI is proposed to be allowed under the automatic route in asset reconstruction
companies. For foreign portfolio investors regulated by SEBI, it is proposed that they shall also be allowed to invest 100 per cent of security receipts issued by the securitisation trust. Both provisions should help fund managers focusing on these asset classes in short to medium term.

Other important amendments include introduction of the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development's (OECD) recommendation on certain action plan of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project, tax incentives for units located in International Financial Services Center, systematic phase out of tax incentives currently available under the tax laws and replacing it with tax incentive for startups and entities generating employment.

The industry still craves for clarity around characterisation of gains of an AIF to be treated as ‘capital gain’, extension of tax passthrough to all categories of AIFs and allowing retirement and pension funds invest in AIFs – though the circular issued yesterday should address one of the concerns in this regard (regarding characterization).

One would hope the government issues the necessary guidance to provide certainty on the
above issues, as these are a must for better development of the alternative fund industry.
Vikram Bohra is partner and Devang Ambavi is associate director manager, Financial Services Tax and Regulatory Services, PwC India.

RBI releases draft norms for account aggregators

Such NBFCs should have minimum net-owned funds of Rs2 crore and cannot provide any services other than account aggregation



The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Thursday released draft guidelines for setting up of non-banking finance companies (NBFC) that would act as account aggregators and provide customers with a single platform view of all their financial holdings across banking, insurance, mutual funds, provident funds and shares.
“At present, persons holding financial assets such as, savings bank deposits, fixed deposits, mutual funds and insurance policies do not get a consolidated view of their financial asset holdings, especially when the entities fall under the purview of different financial sector regulators. Account aggregators would fill this gap by collecting and providing information of customers’ financial assets in a consolidated, organized and retrievable manner to the customer or any other person as per the instructions of the customer,” RBI said in its release.
Such NBFCs should have minimum net-owned funds of Rs.2 crore and cannot provide any services other than account aggregation, the central bank said, adding that the account aggregator cannot support transactions in financial assets. Only NBFCs that have registered with the RBI will be allowed to undertake account aggregation. However, companies that aggregate accounts of only a particular financial sector governed by other regulators can be exempt from seeking RBI approval, the central bank said.
Initially, only financial assets whose records are stored electronically and are under the regulation of the financial sector regulators, namely RBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) and Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) shall be considered for aggregation, the draft norms said.
The NBFCs would provide account aggregation services in response to a specific application by the customer for availing such services and would be backed by appropriate agreements and authorisations, the draft norms said.
“No financial asset-related customer information pulled out by the account aggregator from the financial service providers should reside with the account aggregator,” the central bank said.
Pricing of services would be as per the account aggregator’s board-approved policy, RBI added.
In July 2015, RBI governor Raghuram Rajan had announced the intention of setting up such NBFCs for account aggregation.
The central bank has sought comment and feedback on the draft norms by 18 March.

Sebi set to get tougher with wilful defaulters

Regulator will make it hard for wilful defaulters to raise funds from public; they can opt for rights issues or share sales to institutional investors

Mumbai: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) will make it difficult for so-called wilful defaulters from raising fresh equity or debt from the public, according to two people familiar with the agenda of the regulator’s next board meeting.
The move will mark yet another effort by the Indian government, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and now Sebi to crack down on the problem of bad loans.
A wilful defaulter is a company or individual who borrowed money and has no intention of paying it back, has diverted the money to some other purpose than the one for which it was borrowed, or has sold the asset acquired or developed with the money without the lender’s knowledge.
Sebi will, however, allow such entities to raise funds through rights issues or share sales to institutional investors, said one of the two persons, asking not to be identified.
The entity will need to disclose itself as a wilful defaulter in the offer document if it chooses to go in for a rights issue (sale of shares to existing shareholders), or a qualified institutional placement, added this person
Sebi’s board meeting is scheduled for 12 March. A Sebi spokesperson did not respond to an email seeking comment.
In January 2015, Sebi issued a draft paper proposing that wilful defaulters would not be allowed to sell shares, debt securities and non-convertible preference redeemable shares to the public.
The paper suggested that wilful defaulters be barred from taking control of another listed entity, but that they be allowed to participate in counter offers to deal with hostile takeover bids.
Each of these restrictions would be applicable if the issuer, its promoter, group company or director of the issuer of such securities were in the list of wilful defaulters published by RBI, the stock market regulator said.
“The final regulations will be based on the discussion paper that dealt with the wilful defaulters,” said the second person, who too asked not to be identified.
In addition to restrictions to fund raising, such entities and persons will be ineligible to serve as market intermediaries or run mutual funds or alternative investment funds, added the second person.
Bankers said such restrictions would help.
RBI has been asking banks to get tough on wilful defaulters and has a tough set of rules in place which say that anyone tagged a wilful defaulter cannot raise fresh funds from the banking system.
The banking regulator, however, has been of the view that such defaulters also need to have their access to capital markets restricted. “If someone has knowingly stopped repaying banks, then why should he be allowed to access the capital markets? Any such limitation on the borrower would definitely be a power for the banks since they can squeeze these wilful defaulters better,” said Ashwani Kumar, chairman and managing director of Dena Bank and chairman of the Indian Banks’ Association.
While RBI has not disclosed the quantum of loans that fall under the wilful default category, data has emerged from some large public sector banks.
Loans worth Rs.11,700 crore given by State Bank of India have been locked up as non-performing assets as nearly 1,160 defaulters have wilfully decided not to repay, PTI reported on 24 February.
Another state-owned lender, Punjab National Bank (PNB), declared 904 borrowers who owed it a combined Rs.10,869.71 crore as of December-end as wilful defaulters. PNB added 140 companies to the list of wilful defaulters in the December quarter alone.
While banks believe that banning wilful defaulters helps their cause, corporate lawyers caution against a sledgehammer approach.
“Wilful defaulters should be restricted from raising funds from public because there is no accountability to return funds to shareholders. However, Sebi should steer clear of a blanket restriction on fund-raising by defaulters as this would potentially limit the chances of a revival of the company and the existing shareholders would end up paying the price,” said Tejesh Chitlangi, a partner at IC Legal.
Parag Bhide, senior associate at Advaya Legal, said Sebi should approach the issue on a case-by-case basis.
“A complete ban on wilful defaulters may not be good for existing shareholders, including retail investors. Further, such a lifetime exile from financial markets may not be constitutional. Ideally, there should be some time limit (three-five years) for such a ban.”

Thursday, 3 March 2016

Jewellery sector contributes to black money: CBEC chief

Despite the ongoing jewellers' strike to protest against reimposition of 1 percent excise duty on gold and diamond jewellery, CBEC today said the sector contributes to generation of black money and needs to be brought under the tax ambit.

Sun capital


"We have brought jewellery (sector) into the tax net. This is the levy which we had attempted two years ago and withdrawn... This is the sector which you will agree with me needs to be brought into tax needs," Chairman of the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), Najib Shah today said at an event organised by industry body Assocham.

"This is a sector which lends itself to generation of unaccounted wealth." Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in the Budget for 2016-17 had proposed 1 percent excise duty on jewellery without input credit or 12.5 percent with input tax credit on jewellery excluding silver other than studded with diamonds and some other precious stones.

Jewellers are on a three-day pan-India strike to protest against the proposed re-introduction of 1 percent excise duty on gold and diamond jewellery and mandatory quoting of PAN by consumers for transaction of Rs 2 lakh and above.

Shah noted: "... manufacturing sector contributes 17 percent of GDP. We have a huge chunk of industry which is out of the tax net." The CBEC chairman said the revenue department will take a hit of Rs 1,000 crore due to the change in CENVAT credit rules.

"But we thought it is essential because the cost of litigation for you and me are much more than revenue which otherwise we have got," he said.

Noting that the government has increased some duties, Shah said it's done so to create a level-playing field for Indian industries as was the case in defence.

He urged industries to stop demanding exemptions to avail of goods and services tax (GST).

"If you want GST, you should not demand exemptions because two don't go together," Shah said.
 

Dilip Buildcon bags Rs 545.4-cr contract in Goa

MUMBAI: Engineering firm Dilip Buildcon today said it has bagged Rs 545.4-crore contract from the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways to construct 640-km eight-lane cable-stayed bridge across the Zuari in Goa. 


The Bhopal-based company has partnered with Ukrainian firm Mostobudivelnyi Zahin (MBZ) for its technical expertise to construct the cable bridge, a statement here said. 

Dilip Buildcon will have a majority stake of 70 per cent in the joint venture firm while the remaining 30 per cent will be held by MBZ, it said. 

"This is our first project in Goa, and we hope to complete the project before time. Mostobudivelnyi Zahin, which has a vast experience in construction of cable suspension bridges, will be our technology partner," Dilip Buildcon Executive Director and CEO Devendra Jain said. 

This contract is part of the Rs 676.19-crore, 1.084-km-long project, which is expected to be completed in 36 months. 

"There are around 4-5 cable suspension bridges built on a large scale in India, and this would be the second-largest cable bridge length-wise in the country, after Vidyasagar Setu in Kolkata. With this contract, we are now present in 12 states," he said.

Banks delayed in declaring Kingfisher as defaulters: CBI

Banks delayed in declaring Kingfisher as defaulters: CBI


The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday blamed commercial banks for the delay in declaring Kingfisher Airlines (KFA) and its promoter Vijay Mallya as defaulters.

"The CBI registered a case of cheating and fraud against Kingfisher and its erstwhile management involving allegations of defrauding banks to the tune of Rs 7,000 crore. This case was registered in July 2015, but loans were taken during 2004 to 2012. However, despite our repeated requests, banks did not file a complaint with the CBI. We had to register the case on our own initiative," CBI director Anil Sinha while addressing a conference jointly organised by the Indian Banks Association and the investigating agency.

HT had reported on February 29, 2016 that the RBI was questioning banks for lending Rs 5,253 cr to Kolkata-based REI Agro Ltd after the CBI uncovered fraud.
Sinha cited the example of how the agency's suo moto action against Pearls Agro eventually led to the arrest of the company's chairman.

SBI chairman Arundhati Bhattacharya, who was also present on the occasion, didn't comment on the issue.

SBI, along with other banks, had lent close to Rs 7,000 crore to the UB Group, the parent company of KFA. It was only last month that PNB declared the airline and Mallya wilful defaulters, a claim currently being contested by Mallya.

"While I fully understand that loan defaults can happen due to business risk and reasons beyond control of banks, borrowers and regulators, yet a significant part of the defaults are wilful and fraudulent," Sinha said. "What causes greater concern is that a major part of the NPAs and frauds are in large-value accounts," he said, adding that a large part of such funds moves outside the country to tax havens through unofficial channels.

Gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of banks have gone up from Rs 44,957 crore in 2009 to Rs 3 lakh crore in 2015.

The CBI investigated 171 cases of bank frauds involving Rs 20,646 crore of funds in 2015.


Share it!