Showing posts with label Fund Raising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fund Raising. Show all posts

Saturday 5 March 2016

India says will ensure that banks are well-capitalised

India has "good control" over stressed loans at state-owned banks and will ensure lenders are well-capitalised, junior finance minister Jayant Sinha said on Friday.

Speaking as senior officials from the banks, the Reserve Bank of India and the finance ministry held an annual meeting, Sinha said the government would allocate capital based on the banks' capital-adequacy ratios, performance and credit growth.
"We will provide more as necessary to ensure that our banks are well-capitalised," he told reporters.
"As far as the set of stressed assets is concerned, as far as the NPA (non-performing assets) situation is concerned, that we think we now have very good control over and of course (we are) working very closely with the RBI."
Some critics accused the government of skimping on a bailout for the ailing state banks after Finance Minister Arun Jaitley did not announce additional funding in his Feb. 29 budget.
He stuck to plans to provide state banks with 250 billion rupees ($3.7 billion) of new capital in the next financial year towards a sector-wide bailout that the government estimates will cost $26 billion over four years.
Stressed loans -- those that have already turned bad and those seen at risk of doing so -- amount to 8 trillion Indian rupees ($119 billion), or 11.25 percent of total loans, Sinha said on Friday.
A recent surge in bad loans at state-run lenders after their regulator ordered a clean-up has led rating agencies to suggest banks will need more capital support from the government to cover losses and meet Basel III global banking rules.
More than two-dozen state-run lenders account for over two-thirds of India's banking assets and some 85 percent of troubled loans in the financial sector.

($1 = 67.0630 rupees)

Raghuram Rajan to wait until April to cut rates again

The Reserve Bank of India will wait a month to cut interest rates again, according to economists in a Reuters poll who mostly said New Delhi's latest fiscal deficit target looked optimistic.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley committed to fiscal discipline in his Feb 29 budget, lowering the deficit target further for the fiscal year that starts next month, but offered little in the way of reforms investors have been waiting for.
Investors and traders in financial markets have been hoping RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan will follow soon with a rate cut, like he did last year.
But the majority of economists polled said he would not repeat the surprise cut of 25 basis points he delivered just a few days after last year's budget, with 20 of 28 saying a cut was unlikely before next month's policy review on April 5.
"Although we doubt the fiscal math, the fact that the government has been sticking to the stated math, in whatever way they are doing it, creates room for Rajan to cut rates soon," said Kunal Kundu, India economist at Societe Generale.
"They will probably bring the fiscal deficit down in a way that is not desirable, by cutting public capex, but Rajan has indicated that even if fiscal consolidation leads to lower growth he would still be OK with it," he said.
Asked what they thought about the fiscal deficit target for the next fiscal year, nearly two-thirds of the economists said Jaitley was being optimistic. The rest felt it was about right.
About two-thirds, 17 of 25, also predict the RBI will cut its benchmark repo rate by 25 basis points to 6.50 percent next month. Two predicted a deeper 50 basis point cut to 6.25 percent, while six saw no change.
After an April cut, the RBI is set to ease policy again in the last quarter of the year, according to the consensus view.
That is a very different outlook from what happened last year, when the RBI sliced 125 basis points off rates, twice unexpectedly and in-between meetings.
Last year's rate cuts came as inflation cooled rapidly around the world, triggering a wave of similar easier policy from major central banks. Consumer price inflation in India was 5.7 percent in January.
That exceeds Rajan's inflation target of 5 percent set for March 2017. Coupled with a weakening rupee, predicted to fall to record lows in the coming 12 months, rising inflation could stall the RBI's easing cycle.
There is a roughly one-in-three chance of the rupee falling to 70 per dollar, a Reuters poll of currency strategists showed on Thursday.
India is set to raise wages by almost 25 percent for its millions of public sector employees, a once-in-a-decade bonanza that will cost roughly $16.6 billion dollars, something that economists widely agree is inflationary.
Despite that extra expenditure, as well as planned outlays on farming and schemes to guarantee minimum employment for people in rural areas, Jaitley surprised investors by pledging to cut the fiscal deficit to 3.5 percent of gross domestic product in the 2016-17 fiscal year.
The RBI, however, is not yet convinced.
A possible source of revenue next fiscal year is sales of government stakes in public sector companies, the budget says.
But successive governments have had a poor track record selling off companies and it could be especially hard amid global stock market turmoil.

Three policymakers aware of the RBI's budget deliberations said they were combing the numbers to test how Jaitley struck a balance and whether the impact of the public pay rise had been fully accounted for.

Sun Capital

The World’s Top 8 Investment Banks

The easiest way to rank investment banks is through figures such as revenue numbers and employee headcount.
  1. Founded in 1869, Goldman Sachs’ services include investment banking, institutional client services and lending. It reported net revenues of $34.2 billion in 2013 -- $6 billion from the investment banking division.
  1. JP Morgan Chase reports net revenues of $2.2 billion, including $1.7 billion from investment banking. It operates in 60 countries and employs 260,000 while offering a diverse set of services.
  1. Barclays reported a total income of £28.4 billion, with £10.7 billion from investment banking. Founded in 1896, the London-based bank has a strong presence in retail and commercial banking, as well as the card-processing business.
  1. Bank of America Merrill Lynch operates in 40 countries, and in 2013 had global revenue of $6 billion. $1.3 billion came from investment banking. The company was formed when Bank of America took over Merrill Lynch after the 2008 financial crisis.
  1. Morgan Stanley reported net revenues of $5.4 billion, with $1.2 billion from investment banking. It offers prime brokerage, custodian, settlement and clearing services in addition to the usual banking functions.
  1. Germany’s Deutsche Bank reported net revenues of €31.9 billion. It’s one of Europe’s largest financial services firms, and it specializes in cross-border payments and international trade financing.
  1. Citigroup traces its roots back to Citibank in 1812. It employs 251,000 people, operates in 160 countries, and had investment banking revenues of $1.4 billion in 2013.
  1. Credit Suisse had a net income of 2.1 billion Swiss francs in 2013. It dates back to 1856 and now employs 46,000 people over 50 countries.

Sun Capital

Nabard likely to get nod for Rs 5,000 crore tax free bonds

The finance ministry is likely to allocate a tax-free bond quota of Rs 5,000 crore to National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Nabard) this financial year — a quota which was earlier surrendered by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), according to two sources aware of the development.


The finance ministry is likely to allocate a tax-free bond quota of Rs 5,000 crore to National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Nabard) this financial year — a quota which was earlier surrendered by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), according to two sources aware of the development.
“We have received a communication from the finance ministry regarding the allocation of the Rs 5,000-crore tax-free bond limit. We are yet to receive an official communication from the CBDT. If we get the official go-ahead, we will have to raise the entire amount by the end of March this year,” a senior executive from Nabard told FE.
NHAI, which was allotted a tax-free bond quota of Rs 24,000 crore for this year, had surrendered a quota of Rs 5,000 crore back to the government a few weeks back, according to sources.
The company has raised between Rs 13,000 crore and Rs 14,000 crore via tax-free bonds this fiscal year and may further raise Rs 5,000 crore according to bond arrangers. NHAI’s recently conducted public issue of tax-free bonds received considerable response from investors who bid more than twice the issue size of Rs 10,000 crore.
Bond market sources had indicated that close to eight entities had written to the finance ministry requesting to be allotted the newly freed-up limit.
If Nabard gets the final notification from CBDT, it will have to raise at least Rs 3,500 crore through the public issue of tax-free bonds while the rest could be raised through the private placement route, according to the government notification on tax-free bonds which says at least 70% of the allotted amount has to be raised through public issue.
In FY16, NHAI, Indian Railway Finance Corporation, Housing and Urban Development Corporation, Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency, Power Finance Corp, Rural Electrification Corp and NTPC had been permitted to raise a total of Rs 40,000 crore through tax-free bonds.
The instrument had made a comeback this fiscal after remaining absent in FY15. Tax-free bonds were introduced in 2011-12 with an overall limit of Rs 30,000 crore to boost infrastructure spending.
In 2012-13, the limit was doubled to Rs 60,000 crore.
However, companies just raised Rs 18,000 crore through these bonds which was way below the target. In FY14, the limit was kept at Rs 50,000 crore, against which companies had borrowed Rs 49,200 crore.

Friday 4 March 2016

10 Tips for the Successful Long-Term Investor

While it may be true that in the stock market there is no rule without an exception, there are some principles that are tough to dispute. Let's review 10 general principles to help investors get a better grasp of how to approach the market from a long-term view. Every point embodies some fundamental concept every investor should know.



1. Sell the Losers and Let the Winners Ride!

Time and time again, investors take profits by selling their appreciated investments, but they hold onto stocks that have declined in the hope of a rebound. If an investor doesn't know when it's time to let go of hopeless stocks, he or she can, in the worst-case scenario, see the stock sink to the point where it is almost worthless. Of course, the idea of holding onto high-quality investments while selling the poor ones is great in theory, but hard to put into practice. The following information might help:
  • Riding a Winner - Peter Lynch was famous for talking about "tenbaggers", or investments that increased tenfold in value. The theory is that much of his overall success was due to a small number of stocks in his portfolio that returned big. If you have a personal policy to sell after a stock has increased by a certain multiple - say three, for instance - you may never fully ride out a winner. No one in the history of investing with a "sell-after-I-have-tripled-my-money" mentality has ever had a tenbagger. Don't underestimate a stock that is performing well by sticking to some rigid personal rule - if you don't have a good understanding of the potential of your investments, your personal rules may end up being arbitrary and too limiting.

  • Selling a Loser - There is no guarantee that a stock will bounce back after a protracted decline. While it's important not to underestimate good stocks, it's equally important to be realistic about investments that are performing badly. Recognizing your losers is hard because it's also an acknowledgment of your mistake. But it's important to be honest when you realize that a stock is not performing as well as you expected it to. Don't be afraid to swallow your pride and move on before your losses become even greater.
In both cases, the point is to judge companies on their merits according to your research. In each situation, you still have to decide whether a price justifies future potential. Just remember not to let your fears limit your returns or inflate your losses.

2. Don't Chase a "Hot Tip."

Whether the tip comes from your brother, your cousin, your neighbor or even your broker, you shouldn't accept it as law. When you make an investment, it's important you know the reasons for doing so; do your own research and analysis of any company before you even consider investing your hard-earned money. Relying on a tidbit of information from someone else is not only an attempt at taking the easy way out, it's also a type of gambling. Sure, with some luck, tips sometimes pan out. But they will never make you an informed investor, which is what you need to be to be successful in the long run.

3. Don't Sweat the Small Stuff.
As a long-term investor, you shouldn't panic when your investments experience short-term movements. When tracking the activities of your investments, you should look at the big picture. Remember to be confident in the quality of your investments rather than nervous about the inevitable volatility of the short term. Also, don't overemphasize the few cents difference you might save from using a limit versus market order.
Granted, active traders will use these day-to-day and even minute-to-minute fluctuations as a way to make gains. But the gains of a long-term investor come from a completely different market movement - the one that occurs over many years - so keep your focus on developing your overall investment philosophy by educating yourself.

4. Don't Overemphasize the P/E Ratio.

Investors often place too much importance on the price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio). Because it is one key tool among many, using only this ratio to make buy or sell decisions is dangerous and ill-advised. The P/E ratio must be interpreted within a context, and it should be used in conjunction with other analytical processes. So, a low P/E ratio doesn't necessarily mean a security is undervalued, nor does a high P/E ratio necessarily mean a company is overvalued.


5. Resist the Lure of Penny Stocks.

A common misconception is that there is less to lose in buying a low-priced stock. But whether you buy a $5 stock that plunges to $0 or a $75 stock that does the same, either way you've lost 100% of your initial investment. A lousy $5 company has just as much downside risk as a lousy $75 company. In fact, a penny stock is probably riskier than a company with a higher share price, which would have more regulations placed on it.


6. Pick a Strategy and Stick With It.

Different people use different methods to pick stocks and fulfill investing goals. There are many ways to be successful and no one strategy is inherently better than any other. However, once you find your style, stick with it. An investor who flounders between different stock-picking strategies will probably experience the worst, rather than the best, of each. Constantly switching strategies effectively makes you a market timer, and this is definitely territory most investors should avoid. Take Warren Buffett's actions during the dotcom boom of the late '90s as an example. Buffett's value-oriented strategy had worked for him for decades, and - despite criticism from the media - it prevented him from getting sucked into tech startups that had no earnings and eventually crashed.


7. Focus on the Future.

The tough part about investing is that we are trying to make informed decisions based on things that have yet to happen. It's important to keep in mind that even though we use past data as an indication of things to come, it's what happens in the future that matters most.
A quote from Peter Lynch's book "One Up on Wall Street" (1990) about his experience with Subaru demonstrates this: "If I'd bothered to ask myself, 'How can this stock go any higher?' I would have never bought Subaru after it already went up twenty-fold. But I checked the fundamentals, realized that Subaru was still cheap, bought the stock, and made seven-fold after that." The point is to base a decision on future potential rather than on what has already happened in the past.

8. Adopt a Long-Term Perspective.

Large short-term profits can often entice those who are new to the market. But adopting a long-term horizon and dismissing the "get in, get out and make a killing" mentality is a must for any investor. This doesn't mean that it's impossible to make money by actively trading in the short term. But, as we already mentioned, investing and trading are very different ways of making gains from the market. Trading involves very different risks that buy-and-hold investors don't experience. As such, active trading requires certain specialized skills.

Neither investing style is necessarily better than the other - both have their pros and cons. But active trading can be wrong for someone without the appropriate time, financial resources, education and desire.


9. Be Open-Minded.

Many great companies are household names, but many good investments are not household names. Thousands of smaller companies have the potential to turn into the large blue chips of tomorrow. In fact, historically, small-caps have had greater returns than large-caps; over the decades from 1926-2001, small-cap stocks in the U.S. returned an average of 12.27% while the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) returned 10.53%.

This is not to suggest that you should devote your entire portfolio to small-cap stocks. Rather, understand that there are many great companies beyond those in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), and that by neglecting all these lesser-known companies, you could also be neglecting some of the biggest gains.

10. Be Concerned About Taxes, but Don't Worry.

Putting taxes above all else is a dangerous strategy, as it can often cause investors to make poor, misguided decisions. Yes, tax implications are important, but they are a secondary concern. The primary goals in investing are to grow and secure your money. You should always attempt to minimize the amount of tax you pay and maximize your after-tax return, but the situations are rare where you'll want to put tax considerations above all else when making an investment decision.


The Bottom Line

There are exceptions to every rule, but we hope that these solid tips for long-term investors and the common-sense principles we've discussed benefit you overall and provide some insight into how you should think about investing. If you are looking for more information about long term investing, Investopedia's Ask an Advisor tackles the topic by answering one of our user questions.

Sun Capital

Budget 2016: Impact on alternative fund industry.

In the backdrop of slow global growth, turbulent financial markets and volatile exchange rates,one may say that expectations from the Union Budget 2016 were overall low. Amid a need to maintain fiscal discipline and with limited avenues to mobilise additional resources (except by increasing taxes), aspects like no substantial increase in service tax, no change in the structure of taxation for listed securities and no change in extension in holding period for an asset to qualify as longterm capital asset, all are signs of relief and indicators of a stable regime.

Having said that, the alternative fund industry, being the source of risk capital for Indian
entrepreneurs, had significant expectations from the Budget. They were hoping that the
government will significantly accept the recommendations of the Alternative Investment Policy Advisory Committee (AIPAC) formed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) under the chairmanship of NR Narayana Murthy. In fact, the report had a chapter dedicated to tax reforms required for the alternative funds industry.

While many of those recommendations could have been accepted, the Budget proposals fell
short of expectations in this regard. However, some proposals relevant to the alternative fund industry made their way and are summarized below: Withholding tax on distributions by Alternative Investment Funds (AIF): It is proposed that distribution of income by AIFs to nonresident investors shall not be subject to 10 per cent withholding tax provided such nonresident investor is eligible for tax treaty benefits.

This proposal will be warmly welcomed by the AIFs, specifically, the fund managers based in India, who were looking to raise capital from offshore investors, to capitalise on the recent FDI liberalisation allowing 100 per cent FDI in AIFs under the automatic route. However, it would have helped if the government had taken distributions to exempt resident investors or distributions of exempt income to residents out of 10 per cent tax withholding.

Applicable longterm capital gains tax rate to foreign funds: The issue of applicability of
reduced rate of 10 per cent tax on longterm capital gains arising on transfer of unlisted
securities for nonresidents is proposed to be resolved. It is proposed that such rate shall be
available on longterm capital gains derived on transfer of unlisted securities or shares of
company in which public is not substantially interested. While taxation of gains arising to most of the foreign funds would be protected under the applicable tax treaty, this amendment should help foreign funds in tax indemnity related discussions on exits.

Reduction in holding period: In another welcome move, the finance minister said that the
holding period of securities of unlisted companies to be treated as longterm capital asset is
proposed to be reduced from three to two years. However, enabling provisions to enact such amendment in the law seems to have been missed out.

Safe harbor rules largely unchanged: Allowing onshore asset management of offshore pool of capital has been a key demand of the alternative fund industry for more than three years. If enacted, the amendment will help the government not only in restricting export of intellectual capital but also raise additional revenues by way of income tax on fund management fees.

While two small amendments have been made (explained below), a lot was expected about
investment diversification, investor diversification and provisions relating to arm’s length
management fees. One hopes that these will be dealt through a separate notification for which the law provides for – though this needs some sense of urgency.

(i) Safe harbor rules were applicable to an eligible investment fund resident of a country /
specified association, with which India has entered into a double taxation avoidance agreement.

This section is proposed to be amended to also include a country which may be notified by the government. Here also instead of a country to be notified, what the industry expects is that the fund could be set up or established or incorporated in the countries with which India has a tax treaty.

(ii) Currently, an eligible investment fund is not permitted to carry on or control and manage,
directly or indirectly, any business in India or from India. This condition is now proposed to be restricted to controlling any business in India and not from India.
Place of Effective Management (POEM) effective from April 1, 2016: In order to provide clarity for implementation of the POEMbased residency test and also to address concerns of the stakeholders, it is proposed to defer the applicability of such rule by a year. However, it is expected that the government will soon finalise the detailed guidelines relating to determination of POEM for effective implementation.

MAT on foreign companies: With a view to provide certainty in taxation of foreign companies, it is proposed that MAT provisions shall not apply to foreign companies if it is from a treaty country and does not have a permanent establishment in India or it is not from a treaty country and is not required to register under the Companies Act.

New asset classes: Probably the last hurdle from tax standpoint for REIT/ InvIT, is proposed to be cleared in this Budget. Once enacted, dividend received by an REIT / InvIT from wholly owned special purpose vehicles (SPV) shall not be taxable in the hands of the trust nor will it be subject to dividend distribution tax (DDT) in the hands of the SPV.

Similarly, a new taxation regime for securitisation trusts and its investors has been provided.
Amongst others, tax passthrough status has been provided to income of securitisation trust
and income from securitisation trust would be taxable in the hands of investors. Further, 100
per cent FDI is proposed to be allowed under the automatic route in asset reconstruction
companies. For foreign portfolio investors regulated by SEBI, it is proposed that they shall also be allowed to invest 100 per cent of security receipts issued by the securitisation trust. Both provisions should help fund managers focusing on these asset classes in short to medium term.

Other important amendments include introduction of the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development's (OECD) recommendation on certain action plan of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project, tax incentives for units located in International Financial Services Center, systematic phase out of tax incentives currently available under the tax laws and replacing it with tax incentive for startups and entities generating employment.

The industry still craves for clarity around characterisation of gains of an AIF to be treated as ‘capital gain’, extension of tax passthrough to all categories of AIFs and allowing retirement and pension funds invest in AIFs – though the circular issued yesterday should address one of the concerns in this regard (regarding characterization).

One would hope the government issues the necessary guidance to provide certainty on the
above issues, as these are a must for better development of the alternative fund industry.
Vikram Bohra is partner and Devang Ambavi is associate director manager, Financial Services Tax and Regulatory Services, PwC India.

RBI releases draft norms for account aggregators

Such NBFCs should have minimum net-owned funds of Rs2 crore and cannot provide any services other than account aggregation



The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Thursday released draft guidelines for setting up of non-banking finance companies (NBFC) that would act as account aggregators and provide customers with a single platform view of all their financial holdings across banking, insurance, mutual funds, provident funds and shares.
“At present, persons holding financial assets such as, savings bank deposits, fixed deposits, mutual funds and insurance policies do not get a consolidated view of their financial asset holdings, especially when the entities fall under the purview of different financial sector regulators. Account aggregators would fill this gap by collecting and providing information of customers’ financial assets in a consolidated, organized and retrievable manner to the customer or any other person as per the instructions of the customer,” RBI said in its release.
Such NBFCs should have minimum net-owned funds of Rs.2 crore and cannot provide any services other than account aggregation, the central bank said, adding that the account aggregator cannot support transactions in financial assets. Only NBFCs that have registered with the RBI will be allowed to undertake account aggregation. However, companies that aggregate accounts of only a particular financial sector governed by other regulators can be exempt from seeking RBI approval, the central bank said.
Initially, only financial assets whose records are stored electronically and are under the regulation of the financial sector regulators, namely RBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) and Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) shall be considered for aggregation, the draft norms said.
The NBFCs would provide account aggregation services in response to a specific application by the customer for availing such services and would be backed by appropriate agreements and authorisations, the draft norms said.
“No financial asset-related customer information pulled out by the account aggregator from the financial service providers should reside with the account aggregator,” the central bank said.
Pricing of services would be as per the account aggregator’s board-approved policy, RBI added.
In July 2015, RBI governor Raghuram Rajan had announced the intention of setting up such NBFCs for account aggregation.
The central bank has sought comment and feedback on the draft norms by 18 March.

Thursday 3 March 2016

Jewellery sector contributes to black money: CBEC chief

Despite the ongoing jewellers' strike to protest against reimposition of 1 percent excise duty on gold and diamond jewellery, CBEC today said the sector contributes to generation of black money and needs to be brought under the tax ambit.

Sun capital


"We have brought jewellery (sector) into the tax net. This is the levy which we had attempted two years ago and withdrawn... This is the sector which you will agree with me needs to be brought into tax needs," Chairman of the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), Najib Shah today said at an event organised by industry body Assocham.

"This is a sector which lends itself to generation of unaccounted wealth." Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in the Budget for 2016-17 had proposed 1 percent excise duty on jewellery without input credit or 12.5 percent with input tax credit on jewellery excluding silver other than studded with diamonds and some other precious stones.

Jewellers are on a three-day pan-India strike to protest against the proposed re-introduction of 1 percent excise duty on gold and diamond jewellery and mandatory quoting of PAN by consumers for transaction of Rs 2 lakh and above.

Shah noted: "... manufacturing sector contributes 17 percent of GDP. We have a huge chunk of industry which is out of the tax net." The CBEC chairman said the revenue department will take a hit of Rs 1,000 crore due to the change in CENVAT credit rules.

"But we thought it is essential because the cost of litigation for you and me are much more than revenue which otherwise we have got," he said.

Noting that the government has increased some duties, Shah said it's done so to create a level-playing field for Indian industries as was the case in defence.

He urged industries to stop demanding exemptions to avail of goods and services tax (GST).

"If you want GST, you should not demand exemptions because two don't go together," Shah said.
 

Banks delayed in declaring Kingfisher as defaulters: CBI

Banks delayed in declaring Kingfisher as defaulters: CBI


The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday blamed commercial banks for the delay in declaring Kingfisher Airlines (KFA) and its promoter Vijay Mallya as defaulters.

"The CBI registered a case of cheating and fraud against Kingfisher and its erstwhile management involving allegations of defrauding banks to the tune of Rs 7,000 crore. This case was registered in July 2015, but loans were taken during 2004 to 2012. However, despite our repeated requests, banks did not file a complaint with the CBI. We had to register the case on our own initiative," CBI director Anil Sinha while addressing a conference jointly organised by the Indian Banks Association and the investigating agency.

HT had reported on February 29, 2016 that the RBI was questioning banks for lending Rs 5,253 cr to Kolkata-based REI Agro Ltd after the CBI uncovered fraud.
Sinha cited the example of how the agency's suo moto action against Pearls Agro eventually led to the arrest of the company's chairman.

SBI chairman Arundhati Bhattacharya, who was also present on the occasion, didn't comment on the issue.

SBI, along with other banks, had lent close to Rs 7,000 crore to the UB Group, the parent company of KFA. It was only last month that PNB declared the airline and Mallya wilful defaulters, a claim currently being contested by Mallya.

"While I fully understand that loan defaults can happen due to business risk and reasons beyond control of banks, borrowers and regulators, yet a significant part of the defaults are wilful and fraudulent," Sinha said. "What causes greater concern is that a major part of the NPAs and frauds are in large-value accounts," he said, adding that a large part of such funds moves outside the country to tax havens through unofficial channels.

Gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of banks have gone up from Rs 44,957 crore in 2009 to Rs 3 lakh crore in 2015.

The CBI investigated 171 cases of bank frauds involving Rs 20,646 crore of funds in 2015.


Wednesday 2 March 2016

Budget 2016: Food marketing opened to MNC multi-brand retailers

In a major move, the government has opened the food sector to 100% foreign direct investment (FDI) to multi-brand retailers via the Foreign Investment Promotion Board..


In a major move, the government has opened the food sector to 100% foreign direct investment (FDI) to multi-brand retailers via the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) route. Finance minister Arun Jaitley announced in the Budget, presented on Monday, that, “100% FDI will be allowed through the FIPB route in the marketing of food products produced and manufactured in India”.
This basically means that foreign retailers in the food sector can set up marketing outlets in the country but will have to sell food products manufactured by Indian producers. Analysts said this means that Global retailers like Marks and Spencer’s or Tesco, which have food services units, can now set up marketing outlets in the country where they can sell food products manufactured by Indian companies.
Food processing minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal said on Tuesday that 100% FDI will be permitted only in multi-brand retailing of food products, and not in all items. Also, while the extant rule on FDI in multi-brand retailing of any product mandates that at least 30% of raw materials have to be sourced from the domestic market, in food processing, a foreign retailer will have to procure 100% of raw materials from domestic sources to be eligible to bring in 100% FDI.
If a foreign retailer doesn’t wish to source the entire raw materials from the domestic market for multi-brand retailing in food products, it can still set up shop, but the FDI has to be restricted to 51%. Also, it has to fulfill the usual conditions stipulated for multi-brand retailing, food processing secretary Avinash Srivastava told FE.
Currently, rules allow foreign food firms to set up shop in the country to produce and market their products like Coca-Cola or Pepsi does. However, the new proposal opens room for any global retailer to simply market products manufactured by Indian companies.
“This can range from tying up with small domestic retailers making some specific food products, who do not have the wherewithal to expand, or having alliance with even big players. The detailed rules will be known when the department of industrial policy and promotion comes out with the guidelines,” says Harminder Sahni of Wazir Advisors, a New Delhi-based retail industry consulting firm. The new rules will now allow “foreign companies to set up up shops here and bring in a lot of technology such as cold chains” to reduce wastage and improve efficiency in farming.
The domestic consumer retail market is estimated at about R12 lakh crore, of which half consists of selling food and food products. The wastage of food from the farm before it reaches the consumer is estimated to be about 15%-20%, or about R92,000 crore, every year because of lack of storage facilities and transportation.
“Allowing 100% foreign investment in the retail of domestically-processed food will give farmers greater access to the market and also encourage food firms to innovate, so that food is available in enough quantities to feed everyone as well as fits their pockets” said Siraj Chaudhry, chairman of Cargill India, the firm that makes and sells the Leonardo range of olive oils, Gemini, NatureFresh, Sweekar, Rath and Sunflower Vanaspati.
Echoing similar sentiments, Krish Iyer, president of Walmart India, said the move would encourage the industry to produce locally rather than import food products and sell it here. “This far-reaching reform will benefit farmers, give impetus to food the processing industry and create vast employment opportunities,” Iyer said.

IDBI Bank looking to double business by FY19

Will catch up with the industry average of 12-15% growth, says MD & CEO
Mr. Kishor Karat, MD & CEO 

As part of its three year medium term strategic business plan, IDBI Bank on Tuesday said it is planning to double its business, rebalance loan portfolio towards micro, small and medium enterprises, agriculture and retail credit, augment low-cost deposits and purge the balance sheet of bad loans.

The public sector lender has unveiled the plan in the backdrop of it posting a huge loss of Rs. 2,184 crore in the October-December 2016 quarter and the government announcing in the Budget that it will consider the option of reducing its stake in the bank to below 50 per cent.

Under the plan, IDBI Bank expects to double its business (deposits plus advances) to Rs. 10-lakh crore (deposits of Rs. 5.50 lakh crore and advances of Rs. 4.50 lakh crore) by FY19 from the estimated Rs.5 lakh crore (deposits: Rs. 2.85 lakh crore and advances: Rs. 2.35 lakh crore) in FY16.

IDBI Bank will rebalance its portfolio so that the share of loans to retail, micro, small and medium enterprises and agriculture segments increases to 41 per cent of total loans in three years from 33 per cent now.

Consequently, the share of corporate and infrastructure loans in the total loans will come down to 37 per cent (43 per cent now) and 2 per cent (24 per cent), respectively.

Kishor Kharat, MD and CEO, said his bank has overcome the limitations on balance sheet growth arising from it not being able to meet the priority sector lending targets and is now at an inflection point.

Observing that the bank has grown at 5-6 per cent over the last few years due to the limitations, he said it will catch up with the banking industry’s average business growth of 12-15 per cent.

To bring down the cost of deposits, the bank plans to augment low-cost current account and savings account deposits from 25 per cent to 35 per cent of total deposits and reduce dependence on bulk deposits from 44.6 per cent to 32.6 per cent during the three-year period. This will bring down the cost of deposits to 5.9 per cent from 7.4 per cent as at December-end 2015.

The bank will contain the gross non-performing assets to below 3 per cent from 8.94 per cent as at December-end 2015 by stepping up efforts for recovery/resolution of bad loans. It will bring down the net NPAs to near zero from 4.60 per cent through intensive recovery and upgradation of accounts.

Branch expansion
To support business expansion, IDBI Bank will add 2,000 branches over the next three years, including 500 branches and 1,500 low cost banking points, and add 6,000 employees to its present count of 15,500.
When asked about his opinion on consolidation among public sector banks, Kharat said the strengthening of his bank’s balance sheet could help it takeover a bank.


IDBI Bank will rebalance its portfolio so that the share of loans to retail, MSMEs and agriculture segments increases to 41 per cent of total loans in three years from 33 per cent now

By Sun Capital

RBI allows banks to expand capital base to meet Basel III norms

Sun CapitalRBI allows banks to expand capital base to meet Basel III norms

At a time when public sector banks (PSBs) have been struggling with a low capital base, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has allowed banks to beef up its capital adequacy by including certain items such as property value, foreign exchange for calculation of its Tier-I capital.

The new norms revealed by the regulator suggest that banks can now include the value of the property while calculating its Tier-I or core capital base. But not the entire value of the property would be included; instead only 45 per cent of the property value would be counted.

However, this comes with caveats. For instance, the regulator has stated that the property value would be counted only if the bank is able to sell the property readily at its own will and there is no legal impediment in selling the property. Apart from this it also mandates that the valuation should be obtained from two independent valuers, at least once in every three years.

Analysts with a credit rating agency said considering revalued assets (real estate) as part of common equity may only serve the purpose of regulatory capital requirement. That hardly improves the credit profile of banks. The asset has to be ready (available) to absorb loss in times of need.

Foreign exchange, another item that was not included while calculating the capital base, can also be included. “Foreign currency translation reserves arising due to translation of financial statements of a bank’s foreign operations to the reporting currency may be considered as CET1 (common equity tier-1) capital. These will be reckoned at a discount of 25 per cent,” said the regulator.

Apart from these two, gains arising out of setting off the losses at a later date can also be counted as Tier-1 capital, up to 10 per cent. This will be a breather for the lenders, especially PSBs, which have been grappling with the issue of mounting bad loans and depleting capital base.

According to RBI sources, this move would help in unlocking Rs 30,000-35,000 crore of capital for PSBs and up to Rs 5,000 crore for private banks.  

The government estimates that state-run lenders would require Rs 1.8 lakh crore over the next four years. Banks would have the onus to raise the balance Rs 1.1 lakh crore from the market. This is because the finance ministry has promised to pump into PSBs Rs 25,000 crore each in FY16 and FY17 and Rs 10,000 crore each in FY18 and FY19. RBI’s move on Tuesday will serve in meeting the capital requirements.

A PhillipCapital report believes this would be a big positive for PSBs as it would evade the risk of huge dilution of equity. “SBI can gain Rs 20,000 crore from revaluation of property, which can add 50 basis points to Tier-1 on account of revaluation reserves only,” it said.

According to new Basel-III norms, which kick in from March 2019, Indian banks need to maintain a minimum capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of nine per cent, in addition to a capital conservation buffer, which would be in the form of common equity at 2.5 per cent of the risk weighted assets. In other words, banks’ minimum CAR must be 11.5 per cent, which is higher than the 9.62 per cent banks are required to currently maintain.

Share it!